Teresa Leger Fernandez headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for New Mexico District 3
Born
July 1, 1959
Age 66
Phone
(202) 225-6190
Office
2417 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New Mexico District 3

Teresa Leger Fernandez

Teresa Isabel Leger Fernández is an American attorney and politician representing New Mexico's 3rd congressional district in the United States House of Representatives since 2021.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 496
Yes38%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 3

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Teresa Leger Fernandez headshot
Teresa Leger Fernandez
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew Mexico District 3
SoupScore
Teresa's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 34 sponsored · 62 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Trump just sent masked agents to the press conference where California legislators unveiled their Election Rigging Response Act. Donald, we won’t be intimidated by authoritarian tactics. We know you are afraid of voters who will reject your policies of raising prices and stealing healthcare.
New Mexicans affected by radiation exposure from the Trinity Project have spent too long awaiting compensation. Now that Congress finally expanded RECA, the Department of Justice must act quickly and make sure survivors can access their benefits.
Safety is non-negotiable. We are demanding DHS & ICE act now to stop dangerous impersonators exploiting ICE’s use of masks, plain-clothes, & unmarked vehicles to assault women. Without clear, visible ID, anyone can buy a fake ICE jacket, slap on a mask, and prey on women. That’s unacceptable.
The men and women who serve our country don't deserve to be used as political pawns by a wannabe authoritarian. This is pure theater. Violent crimes in D.C. are down 26%. Congress must reign in Trump's power grab.
New Mexico is unique in many ways, but not in our dependence on these programs. Every single state relies on federal funding, and every single state stands to lose. This bill is a betrayal to families across America.
Donald Trump and Republicans’ Big, Ugly bill and other cuts will gut the federal programs our families count on — and in New Mexico, that means almost everything. Here’s what the @nytimes.com found in their investigation.
The Trump administration just stripped nearly 400,000 VA workers of their union rights—including 120,00 veterans who work for the VA. This is a ruthless attack on the people who care for those who served. It’s anti-worker, anti-veteran, and anti-American.
This is the Trump administration’s latest betrayal of rural America. As wildfires rage across the West, ripping federal workers from the Forest Service in New Mexico will only leave us more vulnerable to disaster. We need fully-staffed agencies to protect our communities.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
496 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3425 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3424 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 539 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 747 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 4216 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 4275 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 3357 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 1917 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 3937 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3351 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3095 (119th)Fast-track passageNONOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 1919 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 3633 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-16H. Res. 580 (119th)Motion to ReconsiderNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 6 / 10Next →