Mi corazón is with the families and communities in Texas mourning loved ones lost to the catastrophic floods. The loss is unimaginable.
We’re grateful to the first responders saving lives. FEMA must act quickly and deploy every available resource.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New Mexico District 3
Teresa Leger Fernandez
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes38%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 3
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Teresa Leger Fernandez
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew Mexico District 3
SoupScore
Teresa's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 34 sponsored · 62 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Happy Independence Day, America. 🇺🇸
Today we celebrate 249 years of this great nation and remember that it all began with a bold list of grievances against tyranny: the Declaration of Independence.
Let’s keep fighting for the ideals of this great nation.
Shame.
This is a real tweet by a real member of Congress.
Proves what we’ve been saying: they will stand with billionaires over working families .
This Republican bill is immoral. I voted no.
HAPPENING NOW: Republicans in Congress betray the American people.
TUNE IN!
When Democrats ask “why would anyone vote for this bad bill?!” maybe this is an answer.
After endlessly moaning about how they’d oppose Medicaid and clean energy cuts that would hurt their constituents, these Republicans don’t have the courage to stand with their convictions.
‘Moderate’ Republican congressmen are caving again.
Watch. Share. The stakes couldn’t be higher.
Because while House Republicans refuse to hold town halls or allow real debate, Hakeem is doing what they won’t: telling the truth, sharing the stories of the families this bill would hurt, and reminding us what our job in Congress really is — to build the good life for the American people.
WATCH:
Leader Hakeem Jeffries is speaking truth on the House floor — breaking down exactly how the Republicans’ Big Ugly Bill will make regular Americans more hungry, sicker, and poorer.
www.youtube.com/live/3pbFrch...
This is now the longest vote in House history. Why? Because Trump and Republican leaders are twisting arms to force their members to gut health care and SNAP—all to hand billionaires another tax break. Shame!
⏳UPDATE: We’re six hours into this vote—and Republicans are still huddled behind closed doors, cutting dark deals to ram through their Betrayed for Billionaires Bill. (1/2)
Latest update on the Betrayed for Billionaires Bill:
It’s simple. I’m a hell no on this nasty bill because it has no morals.
All we need are 4 Republicans to vote against this immoral budget. We’re not giving up.
📣 BAD BILLIONAIRES BILL UPDATE
We just finished fighting in the Rules Committee for 12 hours straight. But the fight is not over. We only need 4 Republicans to stand with their constituents tomorrow to stop this bill.
Oh, also thanks for all the good birthday wishes!
Republicans just voted down my amendment to keep middle class tax cuts and simply remove the billionaire cuts.
Don’t let them lie and tell you this is about “no tax on tips.”
It’s after midnight in DC.
Republicans on the Rules Committee are voting down amendments to protect access to food assistance and school meals for kids, to save Medicaid, to protect the environment, to protect local police funding, and more.
We’re nearly 12 hours in. We’re not done.
People will get sick, people will die, if this budget passes.
This budget will rip away health care from millions causing:
➤ 52,000 premature deaths per year
➤ 23M with uncontrolled hypertension
➤ 288k with untreated diabetes
➤ Nearly 300M without mental health care
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.