Stephen F. Lynch headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Massachusetts District 8
Born
March 31, 1955
Age 71
Phone
(202) 225-8273
Office
2109 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Massachusetts District 8

Stephen F. Lynch

Voting Record — 615
Yes43%
No52%
Present0%
Not Voting5%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Stephen F. Lynch headshot
Stephen F. Lynch
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMassachusetts District 8
SoupScore
Stephen F.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 15 sponsored · 178 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

As a member of the House Litigation Working group, I will continue to work alongside my Democratic colleagues to fight against the Trump Administration’s unlawful actions and keep my constituents updated. Thank you to my friend, @neguse.house.gov, for your leadership on this issue.
President Trump’s blatant violation of ethics laws and exploitation of the Presidency to further his own financial gain cannot go unchecked. I will continue to work with my Democratic colleagues to hold this Administration accountable.
Many thanks to Bernie O’Donnell, George McEvoy and my old friend Joe Picard for organizing a fantastic event and for being thoughtful and loyal advocates and stewards for the future of the Port of Boston.
Had a wonderful evening at the Road to Recovery Gala last night, hosted by the Gavin Foundation. Thank you to Peter Barbuto, Willie Ostiguy, Brian Nee, Tom Tinlin, and the dedicated volunteers for organizing such a meaningful event.
These breaches of classified information are not only unacceptable, they are dangerous. I call on members of the House Oversight Committee, regardless of party affiliation, to join me in demanding a full investigation to promote accountability in order to keep our sons and daughters in uniform safe.
As a member of the House Litigation Working Group, we supported judicial challenges to these and other cuts to critical medial research, which recently blocked the Administration’s drastic funding cuts.
In the first 100 days of his Administration, President Trump has called for “massive cuts” to spending on medical and scientific research, including $1 Billion in cuts to the National Cancer Institute.
It was great to meet with Catie Fauvelle and Siobhan Ransford, advocates from the Susan G. Komen Foundation, today in Washington to discuss the importance of funding for breast cancer research and legislation to increase access for screening and early detection.
I am proud to once again cosponsor the #EqualityAct. While President Trump tries to undermine the rights of LGBTQI+ people, I will continue to work with the @Equality.house.gov to codify nondiscrimination protections into federal law.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
615 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-05-05H.R. 530 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYES—Passed
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 78 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-04-29H.J. Res. 60 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-04-29H.R. 859 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-04-29H.R. 1442 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-04-29H.R. 1402 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-04-29H. Res. 354 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-04-29H. Res. 354 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-04-28S. 146 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-04-28H.R. 973 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-04-10H.R. 22 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-04-10H.R. 22 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYES✓Failed
2025-04-10H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONO✓Passed
2025-04-10H.R. 1228 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-04-10H.R. 1526 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-04-09H.R. 1526 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYES✓Failed
2025-04-09S.J. Res. 18 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-04-09S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-04-09H. Res. 313 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-04-09H. Res. 313 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-04-08H. Res. 294 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-04-08H. Res. 294 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-04-07H.R. 1039 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-04-07H.R. 586 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-04-01H.R. 1491 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-04-01H. Res. 282 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Failed
2025-04-01H. Res. 282 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-03-31H.R. 997 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYES—Passed
2025-03-31H.R. 517 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYES—Passed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYES✓Failed
2025-03-27H.J. Res. 75 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-03-27H.J. Res. 24 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-03-25H. Res. 242 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-03-25H. Res. 242 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-03-25H.R. 1534 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-03-24H.R. 1326 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-03-24H.R. 359 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-03-11H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-03-11H.R. 1968 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-03-11H.R. 1968 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYES✓Failed
2025-03-11H.R. 1156 (119th)Final passageYESNO✕↔Passed
2025-03-11H. Res. 211 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-03-11H. Res. 211 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 11 / 13Next →