Reposted byMike Levin
This piece is a must read.
For months, Trump has accused rivals of “deceitful and potentially criminal” mortgage fraud for claiming more than one primary residence.
He even pushed prosecutors to act.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49
Mike Levin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 550
Yes45%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 49
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 93 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The administration set a low bar for what it calls fraud, and Trump’s own conduct meets or exceeds it. The hypocrisy could not be clearer. www.propublica.org/article/trum...
Yet records show he did the very same thing, signing two mortgages weeks apart and pledging each would be his principal home, then renting them out.
This piece is a must read.
For months, Trump has accused rivals of “deceitful and potentially criminal” mortgage fraud for claiming more than one primary residence.
He even pushed prosecutors to act.
It diverts resources away from real threats and punishes those who are doing exactly what the law asks of them. Our service members and veterans deserve a system that honors their sacrifice and treats their families with dignity and common sense.
Immigration attorneys say arrests like this are virtually unheard of. Other military families are reporting the same pattern.
This does not make our country safer. It does not protect our communities.
Listen to the story of this Marine Corps Veteran.
He says he feels betrayed after ICE handcuffed his wife during her final green card interview. She was following the lawful process that spouses of U.S. service members have used for decades.
Reposted byMike Levin
The Supreme Court is on the brink of a decision to give even more unchecked power to the Executive Branch at the expense of the Legislative Branch. For nearly a century, Congress has been able to create independent agencies that enforce the law without fear of political retaliation.
Reposted byMike Levin
I will always stand with California farmers.
They put food on our tables and drive our economy.
But the hardship they are facing today has been made far worse by reckless tariff decisions in Washington.
The founders envisioned a government that answers to the people, not the whims of any one president.
It undermines the separation of powers at the heart of our Constitution.
This could put more than 20 agencies at risk and weaken Congress’s ability to ensure fair, consistent enforcement of the laws we pass.
It’s yet another dangerous shift of power away from the people’s branch and toward unilateral executive control.
That structure protects the public, and both parties have relied on it for generations.
Now the SCOTUS majority seems ready to sweep aside that long-standing precedent and give any president direct control over agencies that were designed to be independent.
The Supreme Court is on the brink of a decision to give even more unchecked power to the Executive Branch at the expense of the Legislative Branch. For nearly a century, Congress has been able to create independent agencies that enforce the law without fear of political retaliation.
Farmers deserve real solutions, not crisis after crisis followed by a bailout to paper over the harm.
I will keep fighting for policies that open markets, lower costs, and give our farmers the stability they need to plan, invest, and thrive.
www.wsj.com/politics/pol...
For months, lawmakers and growers warned that these tariffs would squeeze farming communities in every state.
The warnings were ignored, and now the damage is clear.
I will always stand with California farmers.
They put food on our tables and drive our economy.
But the hardship they are facing today has been made far worse by reckless tariff decisions in Washington.
This a crisis created entirely by Washington Republicans. I will continue to do everything possible to prevent these price spikes, protect access to care, and keep families from being hit with higher bills they cannot afford.
Now, with only weeks left before families feel the full impact, they are refusing to extend the ACA tax credits that have kept premiums within reach. If Congress does nothing, millions of Americans will see steep increases for the very same coverage they had just months ago.
House Republicans have spent years trying to weaken the Affordable Care Act and still have not offered a serious plan to make care better or more affordable.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History550 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
550 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1286 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1263 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2240 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2255 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 352 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2243 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2215 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H.R. 249 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 30 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 881 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 1503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 36 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 530 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 78 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 859 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1442 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1402 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | S. 146 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | H.R. 973 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.