That’s why this Congress, I’ve already sent two letters with Rep. Casten and Rep. Schakowsky to the U.S. Attorney General explaining the importance of enforcing the FACE Act and asking what Congress can do to support the DOJ in enforcing the FACE Act.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New York District 12
Jerrold Nadler
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes36%
No53%
Present0%
Not Voting11%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 12
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jerrold Nadler
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew York District 12
SoupScore
Jerrold's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 148 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Just four days ago, there was a horrific bombing of American Reproductive Centers of Palm Springs, the Coachella Valley’s only full-service fertility clinic.
We know, however, that anti-abortion violence didn’t end in the 90s. Since Roe v. Wade was overturned, incidents targeting abortion clinics and providers have been on the rise again, including arsons, burglaries, obstructions, assaults, and death threats.
After the FACE Act was signed into law, anti-abortion violence dropped by 30%.
The consequences of repealing the FACE Act are not theoretical. The House unanimously passed the FACE Act in the 1990s following the violent murder of an OB/GYN, Dr. David Gunn, by an anti-abortion extremist outside a women’s clinic in Pensacola, Florida.
Let’s be clear about exactly what’s going on here – Republicans hope that an increase in violence at reproductive health clinics will discourage women from accessing essential health care.
As I said in committee, unless we support violence, we should oppose this bill.
My House Republican colleagues just proposed to repeal the FACE Act, the bipartisan bill that protects people receiving or providing reproductive care from violence or obstruction to receiving that care.
Donald Trump has taken a series of provocative and dangerous steps intended to escalate tensions in Los Angeles.
Read my full statement below:
Please join me next Tuesday, June 17th for a town hall with NYS Senator @lizkrueger.bsky.social at Hunter College.
I look forward to sharing an update on my work in Washington and hearing about your concerns for our country and City.
This purge is dangerous, and it will put lives at risk. RFK Jr. was never fit to lead our public health agencies—and this is just another reason why.
RFK Jr. just purged the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee—removing every independent expert and pledging to install handpicked loyalists.
This is a direct betrayal of the promise he made to Senators during his confirmation: to leave the committee “without changes.”
This isn’t immigration enforcement. It’s a shocking betrayal of our Constitution and a warning sign of authoritarian rule.
The administration is disappearing people—often in the dead of night—without due process or legal recourse. They are sent to countries where they have no ties and locked in indefinite detention under brutal conditions.
As one witness put it, “This is basically imprisonment without a trial.”
Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans are betraying the very people who voted them into office.
A new KFF poll shows that more ACA marketplace enrollees identify as Republican than Democrat, yet House Republicans just passed a bill that will cause 16 million people to lose their health insurance, including over 8 million people who purchase their health insurance through the ACA marketplaces.
I reiterate my call to Chairman Jim Jordan to bring in Secretary Noem to explain the unlawful actions of her officers. If they can violate the civil rights of a Member of Congress, they can do it to you too.
Here is the video for the world to see.
DHS officers came to my Congressional office to intimidate my staff and office. There were no protesters. There was no riot. This is an extraordinary Executive Branch overreach into Congress, a co-equal branch of government and this is totally unacceptable.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1286 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1263 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2240 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2255 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 352 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2243 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2215 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H.R. 249 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 30 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 881 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 1503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 36 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 530 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 78 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 859 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1442 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1402 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | S. 146 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | H.R. 973 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-10 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1228 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.