The FCC is compromised. Under Brendan Carr, it is breaking the law so Trump’s media allies can monopolize our airwaves.
When @FCC would rather kiss the ring than uphold our laws or protect our free press, it can only be called one thing: corrupt.
The courts must overrule it.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New Jersey District 6
Frank Pallone, Jr.
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 592
Yes44%
No55%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 6
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Frank Pallone, Jr.
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew Jersey District 6
SoupScore
Frank's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 22 sponsored · 60 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Republicans say Americans are concerned about data centers because they’re influenced by foreign propaganda, but they couldn't be more wrong.
Just ask the more than two dozen communities in NJ that have taken action to stop them!
I'm devastated to hear that three service members have been tragically killed since the U.S. resumed strikes on Iran. This war has never had any rationale and every life lost is without reason. It must end before any more American lives are lost. www.pbs.org/newshour/amp...
Our elections are safe and secure, and there is no evidence of widespread fraud. The only credible threats to them come from Trump’s conspiracy theories and the “SAVE America” act he’s trying to push through Congress. The American people see right through this scheme.
My statement regarding today's vote on the Massie Amendment.
If the Trump Admin enacts this rule, communities will be denied the chance to voice opposition to data center construction in their own backyards. It’s outrageous.
Trump is willing to silence dissent if it continues to help his Big Tech buddies. It should be rejected.
Every proposal House Republicans put forward to fund ICE gives this rogue agency BILLIONS with zero oversight. This is exactly why I've voted against them: we need transparency and accountability NOW.
This is the second time this week an ICE agent roaming our streets has murdered someone with no accountability and no body camera footage.
Americans are tired of paying the price for Big Tech’s AI ambitions. I’m determined to make sure they don’t. If tech companies need these data centers so badly, it can come on their dime.
This is exactly why we need a national moratorium on these data centers until we’ve put serious guardrails in place.
This is reminiscent of the KKK marches a century ago. This is not what America is about, and we can’t allow our country to return to its racist past.
Happy 250th Independence Day. I believe in America’s promise, and I’m proud to celebrate a quarter millennium of its founding today.
These price hikes and inflation spikes come when Americans can least afford them. That’s why we need a moratorium on AI data center construction. www.wsj.com/economy/the-...
You can thank the rush to build AI data centers for an ever-decreasing supply of memory chips, which is driving up the cost of phones, laptops and other consumer electronics.
Data centers are harming our nation’s air, water, and power bills. That’s why we need a national moratorium on new data center construction.
Reposted byRep. Frank Pallone
BREAKING: Top E&C Democrat @pallone.house.gov calls for a national moratorium on AI data centers.
I'm proud to conduct oversight side-by-side with Rep. McIver, and I'll continue to stand with her as she defends herself in court today against Trump's politically motivated retribution.
Members of Congress MUST have the ability to hold government accountable and speak truth to power.
Trump is trying to throw my NJ colleague, @replamonica.bsky.social, in PRISON for 17 years because she conducted oversight of the Delaney Hall ICE facility.
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History592 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
592 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 2616 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 1993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | S. 1003 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | S. 2393 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 5317 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 4544 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 3234 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H. Res. 1299 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-15 | H.R. 8469 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-15 | H.R. 8469 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 8365 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 8365 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 5625 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-14 | H. Con. Res. 75 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 6260 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 6260 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1259 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1251 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 96 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H.R. 1346 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H.R. 1346 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | NO | ✕ | Failed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1252 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1274 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1274 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1275 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1275 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-12 | H.R. 2853 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-05-12 | H.R. 2071 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-30 | S. 4465 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | S. Con. Res. 33 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-29 | S. 1318 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-29 | H. Res. 1224 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-29 | H. Res. 1224 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-27 | H.R. 227 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-27 | H.R. 7959 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-23 | H.R. 5587 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 6387 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 6387 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 4690 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.