This decision is a judicial travesty with real human consequences. Congress has the power to correct it, and we have a moral obligation to act. (8/8)
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Maine District 1
Chellie Pingree
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 581
Yes41%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting5%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Chellie Pingree
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMaine District 1
SoupScore
Chellie's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 22 sponsored · 165 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
That means:
✅ Requiring country-condition reviews based on facts, humanitarian need, and expert consultation
✅ Preserving work authorization while redesignation or litigation is pending
✅ Creating a long-overdue pathway to permanent status for TPS holders who've contributed to this country. (7/8)
But Congress cannot stop there. We must strengthen TPS protections so that no President can exploit ambiguity in the law to carry out a mass stripping of status rooted in politics, racism, or conspiracy theories. (6/8)
The House has already passed bipartisan legislation to extend TPS protections for Haitians.
Now the Senate must immediately pass the companion bill, send it to the President’s desk, and make clear that Haitians cannot be forced back into danger. (5/8)
This Administration is claiming countries like Haiti are safe enough to send TPS holders back to, but at the same, the State Department continues to warn U.S. citizens not to travel there because of crime, terrorism, kidnapping, and unrest.
So which is it? (4/8)
Congress created TPS in 1990 to protect human lives by providing refuge to those fleeing dangerous circumstances.
The law was never meant to be a trapdoor to be used by a hostile administration to uproot families who've lived here for years, while crises in their home countries continue. (3/8)
Maine is home to hundreds of TPS holders who've fled horrific conditions, followed the rules, paid taxes, sent their kids to school, and built lives in our communities.
Because of Trump's anti-immigrant agenda, and a SCOTUS all too willing to rubber stamp it, their futures are in jeopardy. (2/8)
🧵
The Supreme Court’s decision to allow the Administration to strip Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitians and Syrians, and potentially so many others, is a devastating act of cruelty. (1/8)
Already back home in Maine because Republicans cut our week short, but what else is new! Typical dysfunction and inability to govern from this Republican majority.
Here's what went down.
Barney always had a story. It was one of the things I loved about him—along with his wit, wisdom, biting remarks, and genuine warmth.
As we honored Barney on the Hill, it was clear how much his work changed history + impacted the lives of so many.
What a legacy. What a life.
I'll miss him dearly.
Full episode 👇
Trump promised to take on toxic chemicals.
Then his Admin went to SCOTUS and sided with Bayer/Monsanto.
This is a total betrayal of MAHA—and the *many* people who've been harmed.
I joined Zen Honeycutt, Glyphosate Girl, @booker.senate.gov + Tim Ryan on the WSITY? pod to talk through what's next.
Rep. McIver needs to be acquitted, and ICE needs to know that the people’s elected representatives will not be bullied into submission.
I stand with LaMonica. Today, tomorrow, and every day until this flagrant miscarriage of justice is rectified.
What’s happening to my colleague, LaMonica McIver, is nothing short of a political witch hunt.
Rep. McIver attempted to access an ICE facility in her district, to exercise her CONSTITUTIONAL oversight duties.
DOJ is clearly trying to prevent Members from conducting ANY oversight of ICE facilities.
As Ranking Member on the subcommittee that oversees the EPA, I’ll be pushing Lee Zeldin for answers.
With SCOTUS's decision this morning to shield Bayer from liability at the state level, it’s critical that the public understand how giant chemical companies have rigged the system in their favor.
For years, concerns have been raised about Monsanto's involvement in studies that made the case for glyphosate.
Thanks to this reporting, we now know of another safety study that Monsanto helped ghostwrite—and that the EPA knew this and continued to cite the study anyway!
This is a HUGE deal.
EPA must be transparent, science-based, independent, and accountable to the public—not the industries it is supposed to regulate.
We have won this fight before and we must again.
Awful ruling today out of SCOTUS.
After Trump put his finger on the scale, Bayer won what it couldn't get through Congress: a shield from accountability.
If SCOTUS is going to put more weight on EPA’s review process, then Congress + POTUS have a duty to fix the dangerous gap this decision exposes.
You have a chance to make your voice heard too, by submitting a comment at the link below. This is one fight where public pressure really can make a difference.
When we fight back on things like this, we WIN! So spread the word—and tell Vought and Trump to keep their HANDS OFF federal grants! (6/6)
@democrats-appropriations.house.gov and @delauro.house.gov tried to stop this insane rule in its tracks today in committee, but Republicans blocked it.
Let me be clear: we will continue fighting this with everything we’ve got. (5/6)
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History581 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
581 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 1717 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | S. 1596 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1770 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1709 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-27 | H. Res. 516 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 275 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 875 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.