Trump’s billionaire donors are laughing all the way to the bank after Republicans in Congress voted to give them a massive tax cut. They betrayed the working-class Americans who got them elected. We must hold them accountable.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Wisconsin District 2
Mark Pocan
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes40%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 2
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mark Pocan
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWisconsin District 2
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 21 sponsored · 142 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Republican politicians promised to lower the cost of living. But last month, the price of vegetables rose nearly 40%.
Another BS campaign promise, and the American people are seeing right through it.
For Trump and Republican politicians, it’s all about protecting the elites.
The people of Washington, DC did not ask for their city to be turned into a police state.
They want representation, not occupation. Checkpoints, armored trucks, masked agents harassing people with zero accountability.
We must say NO to fascism in the heart of our democracy!
Here’s a throwback #MagicMonday on the topic of government transparency! Just as important today as it was 9 years ago.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMHv...
Great question from Rob on Facebook! If we got rid of Medicare Advantage, how much would we be able to reduce Medicare co-pays with the savings? Here’s my answer.
We need to tax the rich! They’ve rigged the system for too long. Repost if you agree.
People are smarter than Republican politicians think they are.
Touring Milwaukee Tools was a blast. Always great to see good-paying manufacturing jobs in our district!
Reposted byRep. Mark Pocan
For 90 years, Social Security has stood as a sacred promise to generations of Americans.
While Republicans look to break it, Democrats are going to keep it.
It was my honor to help secure $1.1 million in federal funding for an expansion to the Badger Prairie Needs Network!
They have done an incredible job serving our community and this expansion will allow them to feed even more people in need.
Happy 90th birthday to Social Security! I don’t care if you’re a Democrat, Republican, or none of the above. I’m going to keep fighting like hell to protect YOUR Social Security!
It was an honor to help break ground on a new project that will bring hundreds of new homes to Madison, providing much-needed relief to our city’s housing crisis.
This was made possible by $23 million in federal funding, ensuring more families will have a safe and affordable place to call home.
I had a great chat with @jimmy-iupat.bsky.social, General President of IUPAT, my union of more than three decades!
youtu.be/cnMcvPfOAw4
The Big Ugly Law is the worst of Republican policies. Helps the rich and hurts everyone else.
Secretary Bessent, who pays tariffs??
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 11 / 11