Mark Pocan headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Wisconsin District 2
Born
August 14, 1964
Age 61
Phone
(202) 225-2906
Office
1026 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Wisconsin District 2

Mark Pocan

Mark William Pocan is an American politician and businessman serving as the U.S. representative from Wisconsin's 2nd congressional district since 2013. The district is based in the state capital, Madison. A member of the Democratic Party, Pocan is co-chair of the Congressional LGBT Equality Caucus and chair emeritus of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. From 1999 to 2013 he served as a member of the Wisconsin State Assembly, representing the 78th district, succeeding Tammy Baldwin there, whom he also replaced in the House when Baldwin was elected to the U.S. Senate.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 534
Yes40%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 2

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mark Pocan headshot
Mark Pocan
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWisconsin District 2
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 21 sponsored · 142 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Delivering lifesaving aid to war zones is one of the most honorable and dangerous jobs. Far too many aid workers are losing their lives while working to save others. That needs to end. (1/2)
My staff will be hosting pop-up office hours throughout July at a number of locations in the district! Feel free to ask about our casework services for federal agencies, to issue an opinion, or just to say “hey”. More info at Pocan.House.Gov/Office-Hours to see when we’ll be in your neighborhood.
Today, I set the record straight after Rep. Derrick Van Orden falsely claimed credit for $1 billion in Medicaid funding that was actually secured by @govevers.wisconsin.gov and a bipartisan majority in the Wisconsin state legislature. pocan.house.gov/media-center...
Medicare Advantage is FOR PROFIT insurance pretending to be Medicare. My bill, the Save Medicare Act, with @khanna.house.gov and @schakowsky.house.gov will stop allowing private insurers to use the Medicare name to rip off the American people.
249 years ago, Americans declared freedom from a king and built a democracy for the people. Today, that freedom is still worth fighting for. Happy Independence Day! 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸
At a private Mar-a-Lago event, Trump said he would give his “rich as hell” donors a tax cut. Congressional Republicans made it happen. Promises made. Promises kept. But only for the rich.
Today, Congressional Republicans put their billionaire donors ahead of their constituents, forcing through cruel legislation that will rip healthcare away from 17 million people, threaten food assistance for millions of Americans, increase energy costs, and add trillions to the national debt.
Great news! The Wisconsin Supreme Court finally struck down an 1849 law that stripped women's rights through a near-total abortion ban. This move protects women's access to medical care and their right to control what happens to their own bodies.
The Big Beautiful Bill is great for billionaires. Not so great if you or a loved one relies on Medicaid. I will be voting HELL NO! Now is the time to speak up and make your voices heard!
The sun isn’t up but I’m at the airport in Chicago heading to DC so I can vote HELL NO against the Big Ugly Bill! No way will I allow Trump and the GOP to rip healthcare and food away from millions of Americans just so he, Musk, and their billionaire buddies can get a tax break.
The Big Beautiful Bill (for Billionaires) will rip healthcare away from millions of Americans, add trillions to the debt, and give the super-rich a massive tax cut. There’s a reason why Congressional Republicans are having a hard time convincing everyday people that it will help them.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
534 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-07H.R. 26 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-02-05H.R. 776 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-04H.R. 43 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-23H.R. 471 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 375 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 165 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-21H.R. 186 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-15H.R. 33 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 144 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 164 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-14H.R. 153 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 152 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-13H.R. 192 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-09H.R. 23 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-07H.R. 29 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Motion to Commit with InstructionsYESYESFailed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-03Election of the SpeakerNOT_VOTINGJohnson (LA)
2025-01-03Call by StatesPRESENTPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 11 / 11