My office used to get a lot of calls about this, but unfortunately, it has fallen off the radar for too many of us. Speak out and make your voices heard!
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Wisconsin District 2
Mark Pocan
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 550
Yes40%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 2
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mark Pocan
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWisconsin District 2
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 21 sponsored · 144 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Donald Trump is moving ahead with more than $8 billion in weapon sales to Israel. At least 50,000 people have been killed in Gaza, more than 2% of the population.
Raise your hand if you didn’t make classified war plans in a group chat with a reporter today. 🙋♂️
Reposted byRep. Mark Pocan
#WTF is going on with Trump and Musk’s anti-worker agenda?
From attacking unions to gutting worker protections, they’re putting billionaires over working people.
Tomorrow, I’m joining @pocan.house.gov LIVE to break it all down and talk about how we’re fighting back.
Today at 11am ET, I will be going live on Instagram with
@norcross.house.gov for the @dpcc.house.gov #WTFShow. Looking forward to seeing you there!
Enough said.
For this week’s podcast, I speak with Sean Carroll, the head of @aneraorg.bsky.social. As Gaza continues to face a horrific humanitarian crisis, they are working tirelessly to provide aid to those in need.
Tune in for an in-depth conversation here: open.spotify.com/episode/3EKJ...
Pete Hegseth shared classified war plans, including the timing of an upcoming attack, drone strike targets, the weapons used, and other highly sensitive info in an unsecure group chat that included a reporter. Hegseth is a danger to our national security and must step down or be fired immediately.
These cuts would have devastating consequences for millions of Americans, particularly in rural communities, who have already seen a decline in service since former Postmaster DeJoy took over.
I led a letter signed by 73 of my colleagues urging the Deputy Postmaster General to halt the decision to cut 10,000 USPS workers.
BREAKING: Trump and Musk froze funding to our local Ice Age Trail.
Absolutely unacceptable. I will keep fighting on behalf of everyone who loves this trail.
The American people deserve transparency!
Let’s be clear: the war plan group chat wasn’t just a bit of incompetence.
It was one of the most shocking and outrageous national security f•ck ups in decades.
Everyone deserves equal pay for equal work. Period.
This Equal Pay Day, I join my colleagues in fighting to pass the Paycheck Fairness Act and ensure women are paid fairly for the work they do.
Reminder, the next time you or somebody you know is unable to get ahold of anyone at Social Security, you can blame Trump and Musk, and Congressional Republicans for letting them get away with it.
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
Couldn't have said it better myself.
Finally some good news!
Reposted byRep. Mark Pocan
We're proud to have filed the first lawsuit since the President's Executive Order, attempting to shutter the Department of Education. On behalf of students, educators, schools, and communities across the nation, we are fighting back to ensure education is available to all people, not just a few.
It's always inspiring to see the incredible talent of young artists at the Congressional Art Competition. Congrats to the winners!
WISCONSINITES: Early voting has begun for the Wisconsin Supreme Court race. Make sure to get out and make your voices heard!
More info at myvote.wi.gov.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History550 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
550 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1286 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1263 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2240 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2255 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 352 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2243 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2215 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H.R. 249 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 30 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 881 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 1503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 36 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 530 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 78 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 859 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1442 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1402 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | S. 146 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | H.R. 973 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.