AI is everywhere—and without civil rights protections, it can worsen the discrimination our communities already face.
That's why Congress should pass my AI Civil Rights Act with @markey.senate.gov and @repyvetteclarke.bsky.social.
We cannot allow AI innovation without AI protections.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Massachusetts District 7
Ayanna Pressley
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes39%
No59%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align97%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 7
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Ayanna Pressley
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMassachusetts District 7
SoupScore
Ayanna's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 32 sponsored · 99 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Housing is stability, security, dignity, & a human right.
I held an urgent roundtable to sound the alarm on how Trump's funding cuts to the Continuum of Care program & the delays in Section 8 payments are placing enormous strain in the #MA7.
I voted against Republicans’ $900 BILLION military spending bill.
It blocks healthcare coverage for IVF, bans DEI initiatives, undermines military readiness, and expands ICE’s power to attack immigrants.
The public doesn’t support this bill and neither do I.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia should be home in Maryland with his family.
Instead, the Trump Administration has been defying the law, court order after court order.
They are forcing him through inhumane treatment. It's past time he comes home.
Judge orders Kilmar Abrego Garcia to be released from ICE custody 'immediately'
https://cnn.it/4aQoNS2
Healthcare is not a nice-to-have, it's a must-have.
Republicans have made it clear: they do not care if people's healthcare costs skyrocket or lose healthcare altogether.
They could have done something to tackle the healthcare crisis they created. Instead, they have failed millions.
@liccardo.house.gov & I are deeply concerned about the implications of this sale for data privacy, democracy & our media ecosystem.
If Warner Brothers Discovery moves forward with this deal, there must be a thorough review & rigorous oversight that protects our communities & interests.
🟡 NEW: As the battle over Warner Bros. Discovery grows, two Democratic lawmakers are warning that their party may try to block or unravel any acquisition by Paramount when it returns to power.
www.semafor.com/article/12/1...
Rümeysa Öztürk should never have been ripped away from our Somerville community.
I'm glad that she'll be able to continue her research, teaching, & service to our district while her case plays out.
The Trump Administration must stop targeting her & restore her visa without delay.
While borrowers and families struggle with the cost of living, Trump just ended the most affordable student loan repayment plan in history.
Republicans don't care about affordability and they never have.
The shame and sham of it all.
Reposted byCongresswoman Ayanna Pressley
Proud to work with @pressley.house.gov in demanding transparency and oversight.
With the help of community and legal advocates, seven of our neighbors are home with their families - but we won’t stop fighting until all our neighbors are released.
And we’ll hold this lawless administration accountable every step of the way.
A daughter abducted alongside her mom and uncle, worrying about her elderly grandma back home.
Four of these workers spent their birthdays sleeping on cold floors.
But instead of allowing this cruelty defeat us, the Allston community rose in defense of its neighbors.
I met with the seven freed workers who shared harrowing testimony of their experiences & the inhumane treatment they endured while detained.
A 67-year-old man whose medications were withheld for days.
A diabetic mother given improper nourishment that worsened her condition.
It has been over 30 days since ICE descended on an Allston neighborhood car wash & abducted nine of our neighbors.
Hector, Vanessa, Felicita, Clarisa, Heidy, Dairo, Pablo, Jose, & Yuli.
Pregnant women are being detained & denied access to essential reproductive care.
And the ability to raise families is threatened by Trump's unlawful deportation campaign.
Our resolution affirms that nobody should be policed, and everyone should be met with the humanity & dignity they deserve.
We cannot allow AI to be the latest chapter in America’s history of exploiting marginalized people.
That's why I'm joining @repyvetteclarke.bsky.social and @markey.senate.gov on a bill to help protect our civil rights and liberties in the age of AI.
Hey Massachusetts, LIHEAP applications are now open!
If you need support paying utility bills or heating costs, there is help available to you.
To learn more and to apply, visit the site here:
www.toapply.org/MassHEAP
Pete Hegseth is unqualified & unfit to serve as Defense Secretary.
He must resign immediately.
Inspector General report finds Defense Secretary Hegseth risked endangering troops by sharing sensitive war plans on Signal, sources say
https://cnn.it/44BSEd6
It's long past time we prioritize affordability, accessibility, & sustainability in public transportation — including through fare-free transit.
That's why I'm leading my colleagues demanding Congress do just that in the next surface transportation bill.
This investment is meaningful—but economic justice cannot and must not depend on the benevolence of billionaires.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent must issue equitable guidance to ensure Trump Accounts uplift our most vulnerable families and not leave these children behind.
Healthcare is not a nice-to-have, it's a must-have.
Democrats are united in extending ACA tax credits that have been a lifeline for families.
Now we just need four Republicans of conscience to join us and help save healthcare for millions of people.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.