Hardworking Michiganders should not be crushed under the weight of high grocery prices thanks to Trump’s chaotic tariffs. That’s why I introduced the No Tariffs on Groceries Act.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Michigan District 11
Haley M. Stevens
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 581
Yes45%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 11
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Haley M. Stevens
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMichigan District 11
SoupScore
Haley M.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 55 sponsored · 85 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Groceries are a necessity, and Michiganders are feeling the pain of Trump's price hikes. My No Tariffs on Groceries Act will lower costs for Michiganders.
I hear you, Michigan — Trump’s reckless tariffs are driving grocery prices up and up and up.
That’s why I introduced the No Tariffs on Groceries Act, to lower costs and bring relief to hardworking families.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again – the Trump economy does nothing for Michigan workers.
Trump and RFK are playing politics with cancer research funding. This is unacceptable — @SecKennedy needs to resign.
This #HispanicHeritageMonth, we celebrate the Hispanic communities right here in Michigan. Your contributions enrich our culture and make our state stronger every day.
Protect union jobs!
Our weather is getting more unpredictable every year. Keeping Michiganders safe is my top priority. That’s why I introduced the TWISTER Act: to modernize and expand NOAA’s tornado research and forecasting, so that we can stay one step ahead of severe weather.
You deserve better. Here in Michigan, we understand just how important our union workers are. That’s why I’m fighting for you with my UAW Job Protection Act.
Our auto workers are essential to Michigan, and I’m here to make sure they are protected. This is why I introduced the Union Auto Workers Job Protection Act.
On the 24th anniversary of 9/11, we remember the lives lost, keep their families in our hearts, and honor the bravery of first responders who put their lives on the line.
You won't make children healthy again by cutting pediatric cancer research funding. Resign. Now.
I just got off a press conference with Dr. John Prensner about @SecKennedy's devastating cancer research cuts. This is unacceptable, and that’s why I’m calling on RFK to resign.
I demanded @SecKennedy stop his dangerous cuts to lifesaving cancer research. Here's what I got back when I called on him to stop cutting cancer research.
Enough. He needs to resign, now.
Another example of Trump’s lies. Let’s end this cover-up and give the survivors the justice they deserve.
Here in Michigan, where we’ve seen invasive colorectal cancer rates among residents under 50 nearly double since the 1980s, we know this is an urgent challenge. Families in our state, and across the nation, deserve the tools and resources to catch this disease early.
www.wlns.com/news/house-b...
Tune in THIS FRIDAY at 5:00 PM ET. To access the audio livestream and submit questions during the event, use this link:
htttps://stevens.house.gov/events/live
Colorectal cancer is one of the fastest-growing cancers in young people. With cases among individuals aged 20-39 expected to increase by 90% by 2030, intervention is needed. I introduced the Colorectal Cancer Early Detection Act – to increase screenings & education for young Americans.
The writing’s on the wall – microplastics are everywhere. And with more studies like this, it’s more important than ever for a bipartisan solution to understand how they impact us.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History581 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
581 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-13 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-12 | H. Res. 873 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H. Res. 719 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.