Dina Titus headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Nevada District 1
Born
May 23, 1950
Age 75
Phone
(202) 225-5965
Office
2370 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Nevada District 1

Dina Titus

Alice Constandina "Dina" Titus is an American politician who has been the United States representative for Nevada's 1st congressional district since 2013. She served as the U.S. representative for Nevada's 3rd congressional district from 2009 to 2011, when she was defeated by Joe Heck. Titus is a member of the Democratic Party. She served in the Nevada Senate and was its minority leader from 1993 to 2009. Before her election to Congress, Titus was a professor of political science at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV). She was the Democratic nominee for governor of Nevada in 2006.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 496
Yes38%
No49%
Present1%
Not Voting13%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Dina Titus headshot
Dina Titus
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNevada District 1
SoupScore
Dina's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 45 sponsored · 261 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Teamsters and I agree that it is always better in a union! These are the folks who lay the groundwork for the bright future of Southern Nevada! We are fighting for freedom, fairness, and security.
We are the canary in the coal mine. The #TrumpSlump for our local tourism and hospitality industries is spreading to the rest of the country.  Our ships are sinking because of POTUS, so we’re not buying his BS.
I secured $1.9 million in FY24 community project funding for baggage renovations and Terminal 3 construction at Harry Reid International Airport. This project is ready for take-off!
I am introducing Fine Arts Protection Act to direct the Government Accountability Office to survey the art in GSA’s Fine Arts collection, provide an estimate for the value of the collection, and evaluate its ability to maintain the collection.
#TeamTitus was on hand at the Henderson Chamber of Commerce State of the Chamber address to celebrate recent accomplishments in our community and the work ahead to ensure business can thrive #OnlyInDistrictOne
The State Department released its annual Human Rights Report which removed all mentions of LGBTQI+ persons, persons with disabilities, and other vulnerable groups. These omissions shamefully reflect that protecting human rights is no longer a goal of ours.
The Bureau of Reclamation just announced the 2026 operating conditions for Lake Mead and the outlook is not good. As our community continues to grow, we need to work towards a long-term solution to protect our precious water resources.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
496 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-03-05H. Con. Res. 38 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-03-05H. Res. 1099 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1100 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H.R. 6472 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04S. 723 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-02-24S. 2503 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 6329 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-02-12H.R. 2189 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Motion to CommitYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H.J. Res. 72 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-10H.R. 1531 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-02-09H.R. 6644 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-02-04H.J. Res. 142 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-03H.R. 7148 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-03H.R. 3123 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-02H.R. 980 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H. Con. Res. 68 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7147 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-21H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 2 / 10Next →