Standing up against the billionaires is the right thing to do – and it’s the right way to win.

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Texas District 35
Greg Casar
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 498
Yes30%
No51%
Present0%
Not Voting19%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 35
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web

Greg Casar
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratTexas District 35
SoupScore
Greg's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 6 sponsored · 122 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Most Americans will never get to ask billionaires like Education Secretary Linda McMahon, “what do you need a tax cut for?”
So I asked. Republican officials may think that’s rude. But we deserve to know.
Brad should be released immediately, and we should all follow his heroic example.
Masked federal agents just illegally arrested New York City’s elected Comptroller. Outrageous.
The Trump Administration went after Brad Lander for asking this simple question: “Do you have a warrant?” By asking this question, Brad was standing up for the basic rights of all Americans.
I was a labor organizer before I was in Congress.
It’s where I learned how to unite workers from all backgrounds around one simple idea: we might not agree on everything, but we all agree that workers deserve a raise.
Thanks to @KaraSwisher for having me to chat about where Democrats go from here.
The most important number in this poll is: a third of Americans have heard almost nothing about Trump’s bill that cuts Medicaid to pay for billionaire tax cuts.
Call your friends & family. Peacefully protest. March.
This is the billionaires versus everyone else — get the word out to everyone.
Under the GOP budget proposal:
The lowest income Americans lose $1,600 a year.
Billionaires get a giant tax cut.
Donald Trump is spending $45 million on a parade for his own birthday while trying to cut funding for 16 million Americans’ health care.
Outrageous.
www.thedailybeast.com/republicans-...
Republicans dragged in Democratic governors to blame them for endangering U.S. Citizens, but the reality is it’s the Trump Administration’s reckless immigration enforcement putting Americans at risk.
I tried to summarize Trump’s reckless approach to immigration in 90 seconds.
This is not law. This is not order. It is chaos.
This is outrageous, and we need answers.
If this is how the Trump administration treated a United States senator while the cameras are on, ask yourself: what will they do to ordinary people?
The real story here: Trump has deported multiple US citizen kids recovering from cancer.
San Antonio: Keep speaking out peacefully. Don't fall into Trump and Abbott's trap.
Months after arresting dozens of people and accusing them of being in a gang, the Trump Administration has provided no evidence to back up their claims.
That’s really dangerous. In America, you’re not allowed to lock people up without proof.
www.texastribune.org/2025/06/04/t...
News everyone should be talking about: 100,000 people could die if Republicans pass their billionaire tax cut paid for by kicking people off health care.
www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/202...
Raise Elon Musk’s taxes.
Rehire the Social Security and Veterans Affairs workers he fired.
We must block the bombs we send to the Israeli government and end the massacring of people in Gaza.
youtu.be/VRdnyZLUSUs
Trump is still in the pocket of corrupt billionaires. Fight Trump's billionaire tax cuts.
Musk is still a corrupt billionaire. Fight Musk's corruption.
The GOP budget will still kick millions off their health care. Fight to kill the bill.
Trump's Education Secretary Linda McMahon's family is worth $3.2 billion.
The administration is trying to give her a huge tax cut, paid for by cuts to Medicaid and food assistance -- including for kids.
I asked her to explain why she needs the money. She refused.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History498 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
498 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Con. Res. 38 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Res. 1099 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1100 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H.R. 6472 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | S. 723 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | S. 2503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 6329 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-12 | H.R. 2189 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.J. Res. 72 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-10 | H.R. 1531 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-09 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.J. Res. 142 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 3123 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-02 | H.R. 980 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Con. Res. 68 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.J. Res. 140 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.