Reposted byMark Harris
Statement from the NYT, which is useful context, but still feel like you gotta mention it in the column!
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8
Mark Harris
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 567
Yes75%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align93%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 8
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 74 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I agree. Either he didn't disclose it to his editors either and this is a colossal violation of conflict-of-interest rules, or he did, in which case someone has a monumental amount of explaining to do.
Any Democrat who thinks it's appropriate to "find common ground" with the Republicans on issues like high school sports teams is negotiating with a political party that does not believe trans people should exist. This policy will kill people, so maybe stop wringing your hands about volleyball.
I read this in disbelief, read it a second time in disbelief, read it a third time and realized he's British.
My biggest fear is, honestly, that some genius will decide the show "should look more like something you might see on YouTube."
Best-case scenario: The Oscars get to be themselves. No length worries, the honorary awards start streaming, things loosen up. Worst case: This is a desperate attempt to youthify, and the result will look like
GIF
Seriously: I think this is weird, but that's because I'm old and like it when silly rituals stay the same. That sentimentality aside, unyoking the Academy Awards from a network that has seemed increasingly annoyed by their requirements could (COULD, not WILL) be great and liberating.
I have lots of strong feelings about this, but I'm going to lead with optimism: Apparently people think there is going to be a 2029! bsky.app/profile/thr....
Just came from Facebook, where every horrific thing that happens to Jews anywhere in the world is being greeted with, "Well, how do you like Mamdani NOW?" I'm all out of patience with this. It's an instant block for me.
A friend of mine calls these the "Be Careful, Honey"s.
Fascinating thread. Why is this breaking through when so much hasn't? I think it's 2 things. 1) Never underestimate the emotional intensity of people's relationships to entertainment figures. And 2) How to behave when someone is murdered is the simplest, lowest-bar character test in all of politics.
Somebody ask Mike Johnson about the unemployment report and Susie Wiles, he needs to get his 10,000 steps in.
Ugh, said "polish" twice, sorry and...well, you get what you pay for.
I felt this way rewatching The Firm. The movie takes care of you.
I would add Todd Haynes to that list.
I love a director who loves writers.
When I think of his movies, I think of many other voices: Nora Ephron, Stephen King, Aaron Sorkin, Christopher Guest, Kathy Bates, William Goldman. To me that speaks of generosity, of a spirit of collaboration, of understanding that filmmaking is not a one-man operation. I wish we had more like him.
I've noticed that among movie lovers here, lately there's a renewed appreciation of the craft and polish of '80s/'90s studio movies--their pleasure and polish, their entertainment value. Rob Reiner's early filmography is such a good way to understand that. He knew how to deliver. A true craftsman. >
Laugh a lot and cry a little. www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV9H...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History567 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
567 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-05 | H.R. 2913 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H. Res. 518 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H.R. 8646 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H.R. 8646 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-04 | H. Res. 1336 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H. Res. 1336 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H. Con. Res. 84 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-03 | H. Res. 518 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H. Con. Res. 86 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H.R. 7726 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H.R. 7726 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-03 | H.R. 2860 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H. Res. 1333 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H. Res. 1333 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | S. 254 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-03 | H.R. 7618 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-21 | H.R. 6047 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-21 | H.R. 1041 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-21 | H.R. 1041 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-21 | H.R. 1329 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-21 | H.R. 1329 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-20 | H. Res. 1300 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H. Res. 1300 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 2616 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 2616 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 1993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | S. 1003 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | S. 2393 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 5317 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 4544 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H.R. 3234 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-20 | H. Res. 1299 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-15 | H.R. 8469 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-15 | H.R. 8469 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | NO | ✕ | Failed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 8365 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 8365 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 5625 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-14 | H. Con. Res. 75 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 6260 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-14 | H.R. 6260 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1259 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1251 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 96 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H.R. 1346 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H.R. 1346 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1252 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1274 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1274 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1275 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-05-13 | H. Res. 1275 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 12Next →