Vui lòng đăng ký nhận bản tin của chúng tôi để biết thông tin về các buổi gặp gỡ tiếp theo: liccardo.house.gov/contact/news...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 16
Sam T. Liccardo
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes42%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 16
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Sam T. Liccardo
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 16
SoupScore
Sam T.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 15 sponsored · 37 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Chúng tôi đã tổ chức các buổi gặp gỡ trao đổi trực tiếp với các thành viên của cộng đồng người Mỹ gốc Việt vào thứ Bảy tại nhà hàng Rong Biển ở Little Saigon. Tôi rất trân trọng những cuộc trò chuyện và cơ hội được lắng nghe trực tiếp các ưu tiên của quý vị.
Please sign up for our newsletter to find out about our next office hours: liccardo.house.gov/contact/news...
We hosted office hours with members of our Vietnamese-American community Saturday at Rong Bien restaurant in Little Saigon. I appreciated the opportunity to hear one-on-one the concerns, views, and questions of the community members who joined us.
Our team stands ready to help. If you need assistance with disability cases with SSDI or the VA, please call our San Jose office at (408) 245-2339
Grateful to the San Andreas Regional Center for bringing us together to support our neighbors and loved ones with special needs, and to celebrate their unique contributions.
ICYMI: We introduced a bill protecting whales in the Bay from vessel strikes. Proud of Andrew for leading this effort and introducing his first bill. He's already making a splash, so we’re spouting off about it…please refrain from groaning about “dad jokes” in your comments. 🐳
With new technology, like artificial intelligence, there's more we can do to collect large data sets that can help folks anticipate the pathways of these migrating whales.
Political violence has no place in our democracy.
Thank you to the Secret Service for acting quickly and keeping everyone safe.
Today, on Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day, we remember the 1.5 million people who lost their lives. Together we stand with our district’s Armenian American community 111 years later as we honor their memory.
We're literally seeing grandma's retirement seized to build sports stadiums.
If you're recruiting folks from the Stars Wars Cantina, you're gonna have a hard time running the country. www.youtube.com/shorts/kTc0-...
$1.5 billion was invested within 14 minutes of a Presidential announcement. The SEC said nothing.
Once or twice is a remarkable coincidence, five times in a single month is racketeering.
Congratulations Stanford's Men’s Gymnastics for winning the National Collegiate Championship. Our athletes delivered an exceptional performance and extended Stanford’s unprecedented 50-year NCAA championship streak, the longest in college athletics. Fear the Tree!! 🌲
The good news for Congressman Lawler's constituents is nothing enables them to forget the painful impact of Trump's tariffs, like $4 a gallon gas, and it's only going to go up.
Happy Earth Day! Let’s Save Willy!
Sam’s note: Okay, yes, I’m aware that (a) the photo is corny, and (b) Willy was an orca whale, but my comms team is on fire, so I’m going with it….
Hollywood freed Willy. Now it’s on us to protect him.
Nearly 1 in 5 gray whales that enter the Bay die. The Save Willy Act will protect these magnificent creatures and help mariners avoid costly, harrowing collisions. Together, we can Save Willy.
I’m proud to partner with Rep. Young Kim on the bipartisan PACE Act, to modernize our financial payments system for the benefit of millions of cash-strapped Americans.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.