Jerrold Nadler headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for New York District 12
Born
June 13, 1947
Age 78
Phone
(202) 225-5635
Office
2132 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New York District 12

Jerrold Nadler

Jerrold Lewis Nadler is an American lawyer and politician from the state of New York. A resident of Manhattan's Upper West Side and a member of the Democratic Party, he has served as a U.S. Congressman since 1992. From 1992 until 2022, Nadler's district covered the west side of Manhattan and parts of Brooklyn, being numbered the 17th district, then the 8th district, and then the 10th district in 2013. Since 2023, he has represented the 12th district, which covers both the west and east sides of Manhattan from 14th Street to 110th Street. Before his election to Congress, he served eight terms as a New York state assemblyman. Nadler is the dean of New York's U.S. House delegation and is known for his liberal record and close local ties.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 496
Yes36%
No53%
Present0%
Not Voting11%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 12

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jerrold Nadler headshot
Jerrold Nadler
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew York District 12
SoupScore
Jerrold's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 150 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Everyone should be able to obtain or provide health care without fear of violence, harassment, or intimidation. Democrats stand united firmly behind the FACE Act, and we will fight back to keep the health care providers and patients in our communities safe.
Today’s hearing is part of a wider Republican attack on women. Just last week, House Republicans passed a budget bill that would defund Planned Parenthood. This is just the next step in their dangerous plan to eliminate access to abortion nationwide.
We never received a response. However, Donald Trump did pardon 23 people convicted of violating the FACE Act because they barricaded abortion clinics with chains and bike locks, harassed patients and providers, and assaulted clinic staff.
That’s why this Congress, I’ve already sent two letters with Rep. Casten and Rep. Schakowsky to the U.S. Attorney General explaining the importance of enforcing the FACE Act and asking what Congress can do to support the DOJ in enforcing the FACE Act.
Just four days ago, there was a horrific bombing of American Reproductive Centers of Palm Springs, the Coachella Valley’s only full-service fertility clinic.
We know, however, that anti-abortion violence didn’t end in the 90s. Since Roe v. Wade was overturned, incidents targeting abortion clinics and providers have been on the rise again, including arsons, burglaries, obstructions, assaults, and death threats.
The consequences of repealing the FACE Act are not theoretical. The House unanimously passed the FACE Act in the 1990s following the violent murder of an OB/GYN, Dr. David Gunn, by an anti-abortion extremist outside a women’s clinic in Pensacola, Florida.
Let’s be clear about exactly what’s going on here – Republicans hope that an increase in violence at reproductive health clinics will discourage women from accessing essential health care. As I said in committee, unless we support violence, we should oppose this bill.
My House Republican colleagues just proposed to repeal the FACE Act, the bipartisan bill that protects people receiving or providing reproductive care from violence or obstruction to receiving that care.
Please join me next Tuesday, June 17th for a town hall with NYS Senator @lizkrueger.bsky.social at Hunter College. I look forward to sharing an update on my work in Washington and hearing about your concerns for our country and City.
RFK Jr. just purged the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee—removing every independent expert and pledging to install handpicked loyalists. This is a direct betrayal of the promise he made to Senators during his confirmation: to leave the committee “without changes.”
BREAKING: RFK Jr. removes every member of scientific committee that advises the CDC on vaccine use, pledging to replace them with his own picks.
The administration is disappearing people—often in the dead of night—without due process or legal recourse. They are sent to countries where they have no ties and locked in indefinite detention under brutal conditions. As one witness put it, “This is basically imprisonment without a trial.”
A new KFF poll shows that more ACA marketplace enrollees identify as Republican than Democrat, yet House Republicans just passed a bill that will cause 16 million people to lose their health insurance, including over 8 million people who purchase their health insurance through the ACA marketplaces.
As Congress weighs spending cuts and other changes to Medicaid, our latest poll shows three-quarters of MAGA supporters and other Republicans enrolled in Medicaid are worried about the potential impact of federal spending reductions on their families. on.kff.org/4mPUFd9
KFF bar chart titled “Nearly 9 in 10 Medicaid enrollees say they are at least somewhat worried that federal funding cuts to Medicaid would negatively impact their and their families’ access to health care.” The chart shows the percent of Medicaid enrollees — including by party ID — who say that if the federal government significantly reduces its spending on Medicaid, they are very or somewhat worried it would lead to more adults and children becoming uninsured (85% Medicaid enrollees, 91% Democrats, 94% Independents, 69% Republicans); negatively impact hospitals, nursing homes, and other health care providers in your community (85% Medicaid enrollees, 93% Democrats, 96% Independents, 65% Republicans); and negatively impact their or their family’s ability to get and pay for health care (86% Medicaid enrollees, 90% Democrats, 92% Independents, 76% Republicans).
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
496 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-03-05H. Con. Res. 38 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-03-05H. Res. 1099 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1100 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H.R. 6472 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04S. 723 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-02-24S. 2503 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 6329 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-02-12H.R. 2189 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Motion to CommitYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H.J. Res. 72 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-10H.R. 1531 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-09H.R. 6644 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-04H.J. Res. 142 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-03H.R. 7148 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-03H.R. 3123 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-02-02H.R. 980 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-01-22H. Con. Res. 68 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7147 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-21H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 2 / 10Next →