Trump's attempts to re-write our history and erase diverse voices cannot stand. Museums must be able to operate independently, free from interference from the administration.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New York District 12
Jerrold Nadler
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 516
Yes36%
No53%
Present0%
Not Voting11%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 12
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jerrold Nadler
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew York District 12
SoupScore
Jerrold's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 150 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I am proud to join my colleagues in sending a letter to the
Smithsonian Office of the Inspector General requesting an investigation into Trump's unlawful Executive Order attacking the Smithsonian
Trump's attempts to re-write our history and erase diverse voices cannot stand. Museums must be able to operate independently, free from interference from the administration.
Trump's budget also shamefully cuts all federal domestic HIV funding.
Read my statement on this dangerous and cruel plan below:
This budget isn’t about saving money. It’s about dismantling the federal government’s basic responsibilities to the American people. I will do everything in my power to stop it.
It also cuts funding for Superfund cleanups, defunds federal housing assistance—leaving working families to deal with pollution cleanup and housing instability.
It guts disease prevention at the CDC, and cuts nearly $18 billion from the NIH, threatening research on cancer, Alzheimer’s, and heart disease.
Trump’s budget takes a sledgehammer to basic public health and safety, all to provide billions more for the Pentagon, deportations, and border walls.
NEW: Trump's budget proposes slashing health, education and clean energy programs while growing the military www.nbcnews.com/politics/tru...
Any institution of higher learning who he disagrees with and who refuses to bow down to his views he will try to destroy. That is un-American and undemocratic and we must not allow it to happen.
Trump’s directive to the IRS to revoke Harvard’s tax exempt nonprofit status is clearly unlawful. It can’t be done without legitimate cause and the courts will not allow it to happen. But it goes directly to Trump’s attempt to crush dissent and his war against free speech and academic freedom.
Deputy AG Bove did something that prosecutors are absolutely forbidden to do — use the law enforcement powers of the government to try to intimidate individuals rights. This is prosecutorial misconduct and it doesn’t make students safer or stop antisemitism.
This is an extraordinary revelation about the improper use of the Justice Department to attack students who are exercising their first Amendment free speech rights.
House Republicans had the chance to stand up to Trump in support of their own U.S. citizen constituents—and instead, they voted to continue letting this Administration detain and deport Americans.
Shameful.
Riders don’t need threats from Washington about cutting vital transit funding—they need real investment in safety. That’s what this amendment offered. Instead, Republicans chose politics over public safety.
It’s clear that recent Republican threats to withhold federal funds from the MTA aren’t truly about safety—they’re about undermining New York’s increasingly popular congestion pricing program.
House Republicans just voted down my amendment in the Transportation & Infrastructure Committee to provide additional funding for proven transit safety upgrades.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History516 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
516 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-28 | H. Res. 1142 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-28 | — | Motion to Adjourn | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-27 | H.R. 7084 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-26 | H.R. 8029 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-26 | H.R. 8029 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-26 | H. Res. 1128 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 5103 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 5103 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-25 | H. Res. 1131 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H. Res. 1131 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-24 | H.R. 6422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-19 | H.R. 4638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.J. Res. 139 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 1958 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 556 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 556 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-17 | H. Res. 1115 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | H. Res. 1115 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | S. 3971 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | H.R. 4294 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Con. Res. 38 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Res. 1099 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1100 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H.R. 6472 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | S. 723 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Send back to committee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Send back to committee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | S. 2503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 6329 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2026-02-12 | H.R. 2189 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.J. Res. 72 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-10 | H.R. 1531 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.