Hillary J. Scholten headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Michigan District 3
Born
February 22, 1982
Age 44
Phone
(202) 225-3831
Office
1317 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Michigan District 3

Hillary J. Scholten

Hillary Jeanne Scholten is an American politician and attorney who has served as the U.S. representative from Michigan's 3rd congressional district since 2023. She is the first woman to represent the district and the first Democrat to represent Grand Rapids in Congress since the 1970s. Before her election, Scholten worked as an attorney for the Department of Justice and in private practice. Her district, which was once represented by former President Gerald Ford, is based in Grand Rapids and much of the urban core of West Michigan.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 534
Yes43%
No52%
Present0%
Not Voting5%
Party align93%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 3

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Hillary J. Scholten headshot
Hillary J. Scholten
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMichigan District 3
SoupScore
Hillary J.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 32 sponsored · 108 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

SNAP supports Michiganders from every corner of our state, and every walk of life. - Nearly 60% are families with children. - Nearly 40% are families with members who are older or disabled. - Over 45% are in working families.
Our small businesses are the cornerstone of our economy, and the government shutdown is hitting them hard. I’m staying in constant conversation with groups like MI SBDC to ensure that their voices are heard and their needs are met during this chaotic moment in our nation’s history.
This week, I held mobile office hours in Muskegon and East Grand Rapids to hear from my neighbors about how the government shutdown is impacting them. I’ll never stop working for all of you, West Michigan.
As of today, November 1, 2025, federal funding has lapsed because the Trump Admin and USDA decided not to use the funds they have set aside for emergencies such as this shutdown. 🧵
This legislation would grant federal recognition to the Grand River Bands, allowing Tribal members to access critical resources, including social services, education, housing, elder care, and the ability to exercise treaty rights — benefits that are only afforded to federally recognized tribes.
Ahead of schedule and done well: this is what happens when local, state, and federal partners team up and work together. I’m grateful to our partners in the effort to dredge the Grand Haven Harbor, and am proud of Team Scholten’s work to lead the charge in getting this essential project moving.
✅Republicans and USDA have the authority to fund SNAP. ✅They have the money to do it. Rather than help people, they are: ❌CHOOSING to let Americans go hungry. ❌Using hunger as a political tool. It’s barbaric. It’s time for them to get back to work and end this shutdown.
We’re mere days away from folks losing the benefits they need to put food on their table. I led Michigan Dems in Congress to call on Sec. Rollins and USDA to use their contingency fund, which is set aside for scenarios exactly like the one we’re in now. We can’t leave American families to starve.
Republicans could end this shutdown today if they agreed to extend ACA tax credits — something that 78% of Americans support. Instead, they are spending our tax dollars on ballrooms, billionaires, and bailouts for foreign governments. ⬇️ Read more about my thoughts on the Republican shutdown.
Our West Michigan community is going to be devastated by a loss of SNAP benefits next month. The leaders at the Grand Rapids Community Food Club fear that their patrons won’t be able to afford to put food on their tables, and I’m determined to do everything possible to support them.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
534 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-07H.R. 26 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-02-05H.R. 776 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-04H.R. 43 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-23H.R. 471 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 375 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22S. 5 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 165 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-21H.R. 186 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-15H.R. 33 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 144 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 164 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-14H.R. 153 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 152 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-13H.R. 192 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-09H.R. 23 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-07H.R. 29 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Motion to Commit with InstructionsYESYESFailed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-03Election of the SpeakerNOT_VOTINGJohnson (LA)
2025-01-03Call by StatesPRESENTPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 11 / 11