
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Illinois District 2
Robin L. Kelly
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 497
Yes39%
No58%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 2
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Robin L. Kelly
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratIllinois District 2
SoupScore
Robin L.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 21 sponsored · 151 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Mr. Campos’ death is a tragedy, and it never should’ve happened. Under Secretary Noem’s leadership, the DHS continues to lie about his death.
I’m impeaching Secretary Noem for obstructing Congress from overseeing these dangerous detention centers.
www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/...
Over 5 million pages of Epstein files are still hidden.
Why?
Who is slowing this down?
I will keep pushing until the truth is out.
Release the Epstein files now.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
Secretary Noem and her rogue agents are terrifying people. People—immigrants and Americans alike—are too scared to go to work, drop their kids off at school, go to doctors' appointments, and eat out.
I’m impeaching Secretary Noem for violating public trust.
Every day, I talk to Illinoisans who are worried about groceries and bills. Families are hurting.
While I’m working to lower your bills, Republicans are making the affordability crisis worse. You deserve better than elected officials who ignore your struggles.
Don’t leave your health to chance.
Get Covered Illinois is giving you more time to find the right insurance.
Sign up by January 31 to start your coverage on February 1.
I’m fighting to lower healthcare costs and keep our families healthy.
Learn more: getcovered.illinois.gov/get-started/...
Secretary Noem has called the impeachment against her “silly.”
Secretary Noem, if you think impeachment is silly, then you are not taking our Constitution seriously. You answer to The People, and I will make sure of it
Safety shouldn’t be a "luxury feature." 🚗💨
If your car loses power or is in an accident, you shouldn't be trapped inside.
I’m fighting to pass the SAFE Exit Act to ensure every vehicle has easy-to-find, manual door releases.
Common sense safety > Sleek design.
Reposted byCongresswoman Robin Kelly
No one—not the President nor ICE—is above the law. Kristi Noem has obstructed Congress, violated constitutional rights, and abused taxpayer dollars.
That’s why I support @robinkelly.house.gov’s impeachment effort Noem. Let's build the case and bring accountability to ICE.
Medical research is only as good as the data behind it.
I’m proud to introduce the bipartisan & bicameral NIH Clinical Trial Integrity Act to ensure clinical trials include people of all backgrounds.
Making research more accessible so life-saving treatments work for everyone.
Today is #ReligiousFreedomDay.
I believe every individual should have the fundamental right to practice their faith and express their beliefs freely. I’m incredibly grateful to the veterans and faith leaders who work tirelessly to protect this cornerstone of our democracy.
The ICE raid in South Shore left destruction and families devastated. Since then, I’ve been building the case against Sec. Noem.
Her disregard for the truth and due process exposes her incompetence and unconstitutional actions. I filed 3 articles of impeachment to end her reign of terror.
The same lawless terror ICE unleashed on Chicago is now haunting Minneapolis. Yesterday, I filed 3 articles of impeachment against Secretary Noem for her warrantless raids and blatant obstruction. Our Constitution is not a suggestion.
These lawless actions must end now.
Over 80 members now cosponsor my Articles of Impeachment against DHS Sec. Noem.
Sec. Noem’s gestapo-style tactics and reckless leadership have left communities and families devastated.
Share how these actions have impacted you:
By rolling back broadband transparency and delaying multilingual emergency alerts, the FCC is leaving our communities less safe and less connected.
The FCC should be independent of President Trump and prioritize the American people over partisan agendas.
From threatening licenses to attacking PBS, let’s be clear: Education and free speech are NOT bargaining chips for political loyalty.
This isn’t oversight or leadership—it’s an abuse of power. 🧵⬇️
Today, FCC Chairman Carr came before the @EnergyCommerce Committee. I am deeply troubled by him converting an independent watchdog agency into a political tool for President Trump.
We cannot allow our federal agencies to be used to settle personal scores or reward political friends. 🧵⬇️
Trump’s war on Chicago has brought nothing but destruction.
Sec. Noem’s raids are targeting our families and spreading fear. This stops now.
I filed articles of impeachment against her today. I am standing up for Chicago and holding this leadership accountable.
Reposted byCongresswoman Robin Kelly
I am supporting Congresswoman Robin Kelly’s effort to impeach Secretary Kristi Noem. Under Secretary Noem’s leadership, the Department of Homeland Security has terrorized communities across the country, incited unnecessary violence and fear, and unlawfully targeted American citizens.
I officially introduced articles of impeachment against Secretary Kristi Noem, who’s broken our Constitution as she unleashed her rogue agents across the country.
Secretary Noem: the American people are watching you. And we are outraged. I will hold you accountable.
Join me as I formally introduce Articles of Impeachment against DHS Secretary Kristi Noem for Obstruction of Congress, Violation of Public Trust, and Self-dealing.
📺 Jan. 14 at 11 AM EST
🔗 youtube.com/live/y8yPG6Y...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History497 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
497 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Con. Res. 38 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Res. 1099 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1100 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H.R. 6472 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | S. 723 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | S. 2503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 6329 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-12 | H.R. 2189 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.J. Res. 72 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-10 | H.R. 1531 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-09 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.J. Res. 142 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 3123 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-02 | H.R. 980 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Con. Res. 68 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.J. Res. 140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.