Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New Mexico District 3
Teresa Leger Fernandez
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 566
Yes39%
No51%
Present0%
Not Voting10%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 3
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Teresa Leger Fernandez
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew Mexico District 3
SoupScore
Teresa's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 35 sponsored · 64 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
America's military readiness isn’t 'crap.'
Climate change is a major threat to our national security.
Rising seas, extreme weather, and resource scarcity endanger military bases, strain readiness, and fuel global instability.
Ignoring the risks doesn’t make them disappear.
This bill isn’t a clean CR—it’s as dirty as it gets.
Local projects? Cut. Veterans' healthcare? Cut. Social Security & Medicare? On the chopping block.
All while Trump’s tariffs make everything more expensive and Republicans hide from their constituents.
¡Buenos días, Nuevo Mexico!
Join us on @Morning_Joe at 5:25MT if you’re up early.
Republicans just voted to give Trump and Musk more power at your expense.
They are giving Trump's tariffs the green light even though they know what's coming: higher prices, more expensive gas, and a weaker economy.
Arielle served veterans for 15 years until her job was stolen from her by Musk and Trump.
Her job was all about making the VA more efficient.
She was my guest for Trump’s joint address to Congress where our message was clear: @POTUS, stop this madness. Reinstate New Mexico’s public servants.
Today and every day, we fight for women’s economic security, health, and safety.
Trump is attacking all three—but women won’t be erased. We are half the population, and we will be heard. #InternationalWomensDay.
We’re live!
www.instagram.com/repteresalf?...
We’ll continue to support these lawsuits as a tool to make sure Trump follows the law.
One of the cornerstones of the fight against the Trump administration’s reckless actions is litigation.
Organizations have filed more than 100 federal lawsuits to stop mass firings, protect your data, and save democracy—and have won most.
I’ll be live on Instagram today at 11:30MT.
Tune in by following @RepTeresaLF on Instagram.
HAPPENING SOON: watch live at fernandez.house.gov/live/
I just voted against Republican efforts to block consumer access to energy efficiency information.
Energy efficiency helps families save money, but these restrictions would open the door for foreign manufacturers to flood the market with lower-quality appliances.
Consumers deserve better.
Reposted byRep. Teresa Leger Fernández
Trump’s dangerous lies & devastating actions cause real suffering to women & families across the country.
Watch the rebuttal from members of the DWC. While Trump lies, we will continue to tell the stories of women and fight for a better America for all.
youtu.be/_n82cyazV8E?...
Trump just finished lying to the American people.
Only the rich can dream in Trump’s America. Everyone else gets to live the American Nightmare.
Putin is a dictator.
He is against everything we as Americans stand for.
The United States must stand with Ukraine as it fights for freedom and democracy.
It takes just three House Republicans to stop Donald Trump from cutting Medicaid or giving new tax breaks to billionaires – but every Republican has been on their feet tonight cheering on Trump’s lies and delusion.
Only the rich can dream in Trump’s America.
Everyone else gets to live the American Nightmare.
Trump and Republicans want to rip away healthcare from hard working Americans.
A lot of Republicans have rural hospitals that look like the ones in my district.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History566 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
566 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 36 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 530 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 78 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 859 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1442 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1402 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | S. 146 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | H.R. 973 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-10 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1228 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-08 | H. Res. 294 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-08 | H. Res. 294 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-07 | H.R. 1039 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-07 | H.R. 586 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-01 | H.R. 1491 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 997 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 517 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H.R. 1534 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 1326 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 359 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1156 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.