I'm proud of the work we've done to pass these bipartisan housing bills, but more work lies to tackle the housing crisis confronting far too many American families.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 16
Sam T. Liccardo
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 592
Yes44%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 16
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Sam T. Liccardo
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 16
SoupScore
Sam T.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 17 sponsored · 44 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Today marks 6 years since we lost Congressman John Lewis.
Now more than ever, we need to make good trouble. As an original cosponsor of the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, I’ll keep fighting to protect every American’s freedom to vote and carry his legacy forward.
The CFPB exists to protect consumers—not sit on the sidelines.
Are you a college student or recent graduate interested in public service? My office is hiring Fall interns in our Washington, D.C., and California offices and we want you to apply! You'll gain hands-on experience serving our community and learning how Congress works.
View the official FCC public comment page for the proceeding here: www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filings...
ABC’s on its own Odyssey to keep its station licenses.
Will we ever "fall back" again? @amo.house.gov and I are on our way to find out.
This crisis won’t wait for us. Lowering housing costs will take many solutions –we need to move now to implement as many as we can.
That's why I introduced my bipartisan SUPPLY Act, enabling modest-income homeowners a path to finance and build ADUs and expand our housing supply.
Although eight GOP members have joined many Democrats on the bill, we need to get it moving to a committee vote and the floor.
Empowering homeowners to become home providers through ADUs helps seniors age independently, keeps families together, and gives teachers and nurses affordable options.
We must build on this momentum and keep rolling up our sleeves to tackle the housing crisis confronting far too many American families.
We must not allow the Trump Administration auction off America’s news sources—including the CNN news network—to Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, or Doha.
I’ve said for months that this is a bad deal for consumers and for the freedom of the press. I’m glad to see California, along with more than 10 other states, step in to challenge it, albeit on different grounds.
The SKILL Act moves us beyond the failed federal job retraining programs of the past to engage companies in investing in our community colleges and state universities to build training programs that will actually get Americans better jobs—and an economic future— in an AI-driven economy.
We can’t know what skills workers will need a decade from now, but we can be certain that our private sector employers will know before we do.
View the official FCC public comment page for the proceeding here: www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filings...
The FCC has opened a public comment period regarding the license renewal of KGO-TV, which many of us know as ABC7. The Trump Administration has repeatedly threatened to refuse renewals of licenses to silence voices of dissent and objective news coverage.
We are so blessed to have ALAS here in the heart of Half Moon Bay. Everyone should come check out this beautiful mural-- the first Latino-centered cultural arts mural on the Coastside.
For 158 years, birthright citizenship has reflected a simple constitutional promise: if you're born on U.S. soil, you're an American citizen.
No president has the authority to rewrite the Constitution with the stroke of a pen.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History592 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
592 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1286 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1263 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2240 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2255 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 352 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2243 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2215 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H.R. 249 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 30 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 881 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 1503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 36 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 530 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 78 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 859 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1442 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1402 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | S. 146 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | H.R. 973 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-10 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1228 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.