
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 32
Brad Sherman
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes40%
No57%
Present1%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 32
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Brad Sherman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 32
SoupScore
Brad's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 11 sponsored · 115 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Starting Soon at 7 PM ➡️ Our Telephone Town Hall
Dial to Join ➡️ 818-214-8555
The SEC has cut its enforcement staff by 20%, placing Americans' money at risk — and also threatening Trump's bottom line.
No enforcement against fraudsters who steal from Americans. No one to pay Trump for a get-out-of-jail-free card when the SEC comes knocking.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHg2...
Tonight at 7 PM ➡️ We're hosting a Telephone Town Hall to provide updates on the key fights underway in Washington — combatting #Trump’s reckless policies, holding #ICE accountable & more.
Dial ➡️ 818-214-8555 tonight starting at 7 PM
RSVP ➡️ BradSherman.house.gov/RSVP
To renege on the U.S.’s yearslong rightful recognition of the genocide now is shameful and undermines the Trump Administration’s own attempts to deescalate tensions in the region. (2/2)
It’s disturbing to see Vice President JD Vance delete his post acknowledging the 1915 Armenian Genocide. (1/2)
www.wsj.com/politics/pol...
Instead of lowering costs, House Republicans are pushing the so-called "Save America Act" — a Trump-backed plan to nationalize elections and suppress votes.
I’m fighting to protect your right to vote.
At today’s @ushousefsc.bsky.social hearing, I echoed Kevin O'Leary's comments about how Trump's tariffs are driving up housing costs and advanced other solutions to improve housing affordability and access.
Watch ⬇️
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ljrn...
Join our Telephone #TownHall tomorrow, Feb 11 at 7 PM for updates on the key fights underway in Washington — fighting Trump’s reckless policies, holding #ICE accountable & more.
Special Guest ➡️ @cd4losangeles.bsky.social
Dial ➡️ 818-214-8555
RSVP ➡️ BradSherman.house.gov/RSVP
Proud to stand with the brave men & women of the
@lafd.bsky.social who protect our communities.
I’ve worked to secure critical resources — from Super Hercules firefighting aircraft to funding for the #LAFD — because leadership means showing up before the crisis.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ScVH...
Join our Telephone #TownHall next Wednesday, Feb 11 at 7 PM to update you on the key fights underway in Washington — Trump’s reckless policies, holding #ICE accountable & more.
@cd4losangeles.bsky.social will join as our special guest
Dial ➡️ 818-214-8555
RSVP ➡️ BradSherman.house.gov/RSVP
(2/2) Learn More ➡️ sherman.house.gov/media-center...
I’m proud to have secured over $12 million in new federal funding, now signed into law, to address vital needs across the San Fernando Valley and parts of the Westside — from strengthening fire stations to improving parks, bolstering infrastructure, and other critical priorities. (1/2)
Reposted byCongressman Brad Sherman
Supreme Court, with no dissents, rejects GOP challenge to California's new election map
I pressed Trump's Treasury Secretary on whether taxpayer dollars could be used to bail out Bitcoin or force banks to buy crypto.
I challenged #Trump’s Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent today on the administration’s economic policies — including their claim that tariffs don’t raise prices.
Watch ⤵️
Reposted byCongressman Brad Sherman
Noem and DHS are out of control.
OUT NOW!
Today I voted NO on the government funding bill because it included funding for #ICE
#ICEOut #ICEOutNow
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Con. Res. 38 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Res. 1099 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1100 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H.R. 6472 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | S. 723 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | S. 2503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 6329 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-12 | H.R. 2189 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.J. Res. 72 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-10 | H.R. 1531 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-09 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.J. Res. 142 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 3123 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-02 | H.R. 980 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Con. Res. 68 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.J. Res. 140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.