
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Pennsylvania District 5
Mary Gay Scanlon
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 316
Yes42%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 5
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Mary Gay Scanlon
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratPennsylvania District 5
SoupScore
Mary Gay's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 6 sponsored · 21 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I was proud to support DCCC's application for this funding and look forward to seeing this program bolster our local economy and the pipeline of Pennsylvanian workers in the shipbuilding industry.
Using this $8 million federal grant, Delaware County Community College, in partnership with the Collegiate Consortium for Workforce & Economic Development and Hanwha Philly Shipyard, can expand the number of apprenticeships at the shipyard from 120 to 500.
The killing of Renee Good wasn’t an isolated incident - but it made the nation and the world pay attention to this administration’s reckless deportation and propaganda campaign terrorizing our communities while trampling fundamental human rights, civil rights, and due process.
Dozens of Democratic Members of Congress are on the ground, hearing from state and local officials and the community to get the facts and how this lawlessness is impacting Minnesota - and the entire country.
If you haven’t already, tune in.
@houserepublicans.bsky.social won’t hold a hearing to conduct congressional oversight about what ICE and CBP are doing in Minneapolis-St Paul.
I demanded the reversal of $2 Billion cuts to SAMHSA alongside nearly 100 other Members of Congress.
Congress funded these lifesaving mental health and substance abuse prevention grants because they work!
The Trump administration shouldn't have tried to cut them in the first place.
This administration is creating chaos and trying to intimidate Americans who exercise their First Amendment rights to object to that chaos
The President is throwing gasoline on the fire that his ICE agents ignited.
Invoking the Insurrection Act and putting troops in Minneapolis would be a dangerous and unwarranted escalation.
ICE isn't going after "the worst of the worst."
Here's who they're really going after:
Every time the Republican majority has the chance to put the American people first, they decide to cover up and prioritize the interests of big business and billionaires.
Standing up and speaking out against this administration isn't domestic terrorism.
It's exercising your rights protected by the First Amendment.
My Republican colleagues voted against protecting your fundamental freedom of speech TWICE.
358 days in, whatever happened to "lowering prices on Day 1?"
www.axios.com/2026/01/13/i...
The appropriations process is Congress' last meaningful check on this lawless administration's abuses of power.
From the law's standpoint, the DOJ has missed the deadline.
Release the Epstein files.
The Senate needs to pass the 3-year extension of the ACA tax credits ASAP!
People's lives are on the line.
Punting the vote to the end of the month is unacceptable.
In PA-05, the Philip Jaisohn Memorial House in Media honors Dr. Philip Jaisohn, the first Korean individual to become an American citizen & one of the founders of the Republic of Korea.
Happy Korean American Day!
Today, we honor the contributions, history, & culture of our Korean American community.
Congress should be passing bills to repeal the Trump tariffs and make life more affordable for American families, not ones that actively sell out American workers to line the pockets of executives.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History316 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
316 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-23 | H.R. 5587 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 6387 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 6387 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 4690 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 4690 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-22 | H. Res. 1182 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H. Res. 1189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H. Res. 1189 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-21 | S. 1020 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-21 | H.R. 2493 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-21 | H.R. 5201 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-20 | H.R. 5200 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-20 | H.R. 1681 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-17 | H. Res. 1175 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-17 | H. Res. 1175 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-17 | H. Res. 1175 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H. Res. 1156 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 1689 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H. Res. 965 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 6398 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 6398 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 6409 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 6409 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-16 | H. Con. Res. 40 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-15 | H. Res. 965 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-15 | H. Res. 1174 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-15 | H. Res. 1174 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-14 | H.R. 7613 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-14 | H.R. 1011 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-28 | H. Res. 1142 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-28 | H. Res. 1142 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-28 | — | Motion to Adjourn | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-27 | H.R. 7084 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-26 | H.R. 8029 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-26 | H.R. 8029 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-26 | H. Res. 1128 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 5103 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 5103 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-25 | H. Res. 1131 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H. Res. 1131 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-24 | H.R. 6422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-19 | H.R. 4638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.J. Res. 139 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 1958 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 556 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 556 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-17 | H. Res. 1115 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | H. Res. 1115 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | S. 3971 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | H.R. 4294 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 7Next →