Protecting civilians in war zones is essential for any successful military operation.
That's why I'm pressing the Trump administration to reverse its cuts to important Defense Department initiatives meant to reduce civilian harm.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Colorado District 6
Jason Crow
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 498
Yes41%
No58%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 6
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jason Crow
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratColorado District 6
SoupScore
Jason's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 25 sponsored · 71 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
As the co-chair of the British American Parliamentary Group, it was a pleasure to host Members of Parliament from the United Kingdom this week on Capitol Hill.
We discussed ways to promote and grow the economic & trade relationship between our two countries.
As a former Army Ranger, I’m proud to celebrate the U.S. Army’s 250th birthday.
But President Trump’s $45 million vanity parade—on his birthday, no less—is a disservice to our troops.
I’m horrified by the targeted political shootings in Minnesota.
It’s a tragedy to lose State Representative Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark and to see Senator John Hoffman and his wife also attacked.
Political violence is never OK.
Protecting Coloradans is one of the most important parts of my job.
If #CO06 constituents are stuck in Israel or the Middle East and need help getting back to the U.S., please contact my office at crow.house.gov or call (720) 748-7514.
I served in combat as an Army Ranger. I'm proud to celebrate the Army’s 250th birthday.
But it's wrong to throw a $45 million vanity parade to stroke the President’s ego, while at the same time Trump is firing veterans & cutting VA care.
crow.house.gov/media/press-...
Happening TODAY:
Join me & @petebuttigieg.bsky.social for an Instagram Live conversation at 2:45 p.m. ET!
We’ll be chatting Trump’s military parade and politicization of our servicemembers.
At today’s Armed Services Committee hearing.
Getting ready to ask tough questions & demand answers from the Defense Secretary.
It’s wrong that Trump continues to politicize our troops.
Tune in.
Supporting Ukraine isn’t just charity. It’s in America’s economic and security interests.
A strong Ukraine helps keep food prices low, promotes trade & strong partnerships, and protects American troops in Europe.
Pete Hegseth skipped a defense leaders meeting at NATO headquarters.
Our Defense Secretary should focus on doing his job, not his make-up room or renaming ships.
13/ The servicemembers being mobilized signed up to protect Americans and their rights, not to be deployed against their fellow citizens.
12/ Local law enforcement is responsible for maintaining order and preventing violence; Trump’s unnecessary use of military risks escalation and eroding trust in our military.
And let’s be honest, Trump is also trying to intimidate Americans and suppress opposing views.
11/ The President’s order doesn’t even mention California, and authorizes the use of ANY personnel, in ANY location, for ANY length of time.
This is a dangerous slippery slope that should concern Americans everywhere. If Trump is allowed to do this, any future president could as well.
10/ Not only does this deployment not meet the legal criteria for California, Trump’s Executive Order is expansive and open-ended, allowing it to be used across the country.
9/ Applying the law to the facts in California:
-No invasion from a foreign nation.
-No rebellion against the U.S. government.
-No local law enforcement has said they’re unable to enforce the law.
8/ The President can call National Guard troops into Federal service when (10 USC 12406):
-Invasion by a foreign nation.
-Rebellion against our government.
-Local law enforcement is unable to enforce the law.
7/ In 1970, four protesting students were killed by the National Guard at Kent State University.
Many Americans remember this as one of the most egregious examples of abuse of power.
Bottom line: these incidents not only resulted in deaths but also eroded trust in our military.
6/ In 1967, the military was used in response to riots in Newark. 26 people were killed and hundreds injured, including 40 injured soldiers.
5/ In 1932, the Army was used to clear out a protest encampment of veterans seeking benefits. It ended in violence and damaged the reputation of the Army.
4/ Sending military personnel with combat equipment and heavy weapons into tense domestic situations rarely deescalates. We have often seen deadly consequences and the erosion of public trust.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History498 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
498 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Con. Res. 38 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Res. 1099 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1100 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H.R. 6472 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | S. 723 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | S. 2503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 6329 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-12 | H.R. 2189 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.J. Res. 72 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-10 | H.R. 1531 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-09 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.J. Res. 142 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 3123 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-02 | H.R. 980 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Con. Res. 68 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.J. Res. 140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.