Jimmy Gomez headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 34
Born
November 25, 1974
Age 51
Phone
(202) 225-6235
Office
506 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 34

Jimmy Gomez

Jimmy Gomez is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for California's 34th congressional district since 2017. His district includes the Los Angeles neighborhoods of Eagle Rock, Boyle Heights, Downtown Los Angeles, Koreatown, and other communities. A member of the Democratic Party, Gomez served in the California State Assembly from 2012 to 2017.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 497
Yes37%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 34

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jimmy Gomez headshot
Jimmy Gomez
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 34
SoupScore
Jimmy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 15 sponsored · 80 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Caregiving in America is broken and families are being left to figure it out on their own. That’s unacceptable. We brought together labor leaders, caregivers, and experts from across the country for the first-ever National Summit on the Caregiving Crisis.
This is the man Trump thinks will “fix” the most violent, out-of-control DHS in our nation’s history, someone who believes caning and dueling to the death is an acceptable way to settle disputes.
This is the man Trump thinks will “fix” the most violent, out-of-control DHS in our nation’s history, someone who believes caning and dueling to the death is an acceptable way to settle disputes.
MARKWAYNE MULLIN: Dueling with two consenting adults is still there RAND PAUL: It's been illegal for 170 years! There's no precedent for legal dueling
Trump's base is waking up. People are realizing that he has ZERO interest in making their lives better. Costs are skyrocketing, America is less safe, and the man who claimed to drain the swamp is now the king of it. At some point, people are going to ask: what's actually gotten better for them?
Today, we brought together lawmakers, advocates, caregivers, and experts for the first-ever Dads Caucus National Summit on the Caregiving Crisis.    Because the truth is simple: care is the backbone of our economy, and families shouldn’t have to carry it alone.
Millions of aging Americans and people with disabilities want to live independently but can’t access the care they need.    Rep. Horsford moderated a panel on expanding home and community-based services so people can age and live with dignity in their own communities.
No one should have to choose between their job and caring for the people they love.    Rep. Pettersen moderated a discussion on building a national paid family and medical leave program so every worker can take time to care for a new child, a sick family member, or themselves.
Aging Americans and people with disabilities deserve the dignity of living safely and comfortably in their own homes.    We need real solutions to bring down costs and make home- and community-based care affordable for the millions of Americans who depend on it.
Care workers hold our communities together, yet too many are underpaid and undervalued.  I moderated a conversation on strengthening the care workforce by improving wages, benefits, and career pathways across child care, home care, and health care.
70% of private-sector workers still don’t have access to paid leave.    Having a baby, caring for a sick parent, or recovering from an illness shouldn’t push families out of their jobs or into debt.
Child care costs are skyrocketing, and families are paying the price.    Rep. Derek Tran led a panel on expanding access to high-quality early childhood education and lowering costs so parents can work while knowing their kids are safe, learning, and thriving.
63 million Americans provide family caregiving, not as a profession, but out of love and responsibility for their families.    They shouldn’t have to do it alone. It’s time to build a system that supports caregivers the way they support the people they love.
Care touches every family in America, but our economy still treats it like an afterthought.    At the National Summit on the Caregiving Crisis, I moderated a conversation on how caregiving shapes our economy and what policies we need to make life easier for families.
Each year, the cost of child care pushes 134,000 American families into poverty.    It’s past time to expand access to high-quality child care and lower the costs that are forcing parents to choose between staying in the workforce and caring for their kids.
If you want to know what Republicans actually prioritize, don't listen to what they say, watch what they do. They launch foreign wars, push tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy, and put programs like Medicaid and SNAP, lifelines for millions of working Americans, on the chopping block.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
497 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-03-05H. Con. Res. 38 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-03-05H. Res. 1099 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1100 (119th)Motion to ReferNOYESPassed
2026-03-04H.R. 6472 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04S. 723 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-24S. 2503 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 6329 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-02-12H.R. 2189 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Motion to CommitYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H.J. Res. 72 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-10H.R. 1531 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-02-09H.R. 6644 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-02-04H.J. Res. 142 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-03H.R. 7148 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-03H.R. 3123 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-02H.R. 980 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H. Con. Res. 68 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Final passageNOYESPassed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7147 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-21H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 2 / 10Next →