
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Wisconsin District 4
Gwen Moore
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes39%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 4
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Gwen Moore
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWisconsin District 4
SoupScore
Gwen's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 29 sponsored · 200 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
Join @luriedanielfavors.bsky.social in welcoming Representative of Wisconsin’s 4th Congressional District, @repgwenmoore.bsky.social , BACK to the #LDFShow!!!
gwenmoore.house.gov
There is no room for compromise when it comes to protecting American's health care.
ESPECIALLY when the primary goal is transferring that money to the 1% in the form of tax giveaways.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
You can’t beta test people’s retirements.
The cost of failure isn’t inefficiency — it’s millions left trying to pay bills without their main source of income.
The vast majority people on Medicaid who can work do. They’re the people supporting our communities on poverty wages.
Study after study confirm that work requirements don’t increase employment and function as cuts that punish the low-wage workforce, seniors, children, and people with disabilities.
Tonight under the cover of dark, Republicans on the Budget Committee have convened and are hoping you don’t notice they’re lining up health care cuts for millions of Americans.
They failed last try, but you know what we call the “hold outs”… they’re KTF. Known To Fold.
All of my love and prayers are with President Biden and his family. May they find strength, healing, and peace.
Donald Trump’s reckless mismanagement and chaotic flip-flops on economic policies have caused America to no longer be the economic envy of the world and most favored business partner.
The reduction in investments in the U.S. harm businesses and consumers.
#winning
Investing in America's children is always worth it.
We need to prioritize our kids over tax giveaways for the wealthiest in our society.
🚨🤬G.O.P. Tax Bill May Hurt the Lowest Earners and Help the Richest
“Millions of Americans stand to lose access to federal safety net benefits, according to the government’s own estimates...”
Tell me again why in the world why we are doing this?
www.nytimes.com/2025/05/16/u...
Democrats aren't sitting back.
We won't go quietly as Republicans plot to cut your health care, food assistance, and send American families into a financial and economic crisis.
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
Republicans wanted you to be sleeping while we talked about what a bad deal their bill is for the people.
Here's what you missed ⬇️
I am monitoring the ongoing situation at the Zeidler Municipal Building, praying for the safety of all involved, and thank law enforcement for their swift response.
This GOP tax bill rigs the system against average Americans.
We simply should not, as a society, starve children and deny the infirm healthcare all so society can lavish the elites with more and more.
The GOP tax bill is a perverse breach of the social contract.
www.axios.com/2025/05/15/t...
I know what it’s like to go cold and hungry as a child.
If Republicans were truly concerned about getting women to have babies, they wouldn’t cut SNAP or leave America’s poorest children behind in their CTC proposal.
Our children are worth every dime.
We just wrapped 18 hrs of debate on the GOP Tax Bill. Their plan is clear:
1) add tripwires around Americans accessing their health care
2) count on people to FAIL to keep up w/ paperwork
3) funnel the 'savings' (aka lost health care) to the ultra wealthy through tax giveaways
I won't mince words. In mark up, my Republican colleague has feigned concern over “life” to justify leaving behind the poorest children in their Child Tax Credit.
If they were truly 'pro-life,' they would make the credit fully refundable, so we can lift families from the bottom up.
6 hours in to this mark up, and I'll say one thing about my colleagues on the other side of the aisle: they never give up when it comes to twisting themselves up like pretzels to explain how cutting health care for millions of people is somehow a good economic policy.
If Republicans were serious about helping families, they wouldn't make provisions for children, workers, and the elderly in their 'big, beautiful bill' TEMPORARY (just until the next presidential election...)
Meanwhile they make PERMANENT the tax giveaways for the uber wealthy.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Con. Res. 38 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Res. 1099 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1100 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H.R. 6472 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | S. 723 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | S. 2503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 6329 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-12 | H.R. 2189 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.J. Res. 72 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-10 | H.R. 1531 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-09 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.J. Res. 142 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 3123 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-02 | H.R. 980 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Con. Res. 68 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.J. Res. 140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.