🚨NEWS: The amendment to remove the pesticide liability shield language from the Farm Bill WILL be made in order— meaning the full House will get a chance to debate and vote on this before final passage of the farm bill.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Maine District 1
Chellie Pingree
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes39%
No55%
Present1%
Not Voting5%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Chellie Pingree
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMaine District 1
SoupScore
Chellie's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 22 sponsored · 158 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Families like Zarah’s put their lives on the line. They deserve our gratitude—and a chance to live free of violence and oppression.
If we aren’t willing to protect people who risked everything to help us, we’re not just abandoning them. We’re abandoning the very values we claim to believe in. (3/3)
During today’s markup of the FY27 State + Foreign Ops spending bill, @frankel.house.gov introduced an amendment to prohibit funds for deportation, removal, or resettlement of any individual to a country that isn't their country of origin w/o consent.
EVERY Republican voted it down. Shameful. (2/3)
🧵
Today is Zarah’s 15th birthday. Her family has been stuck at Camp As Sayliyah in Qatar for over a year—along with 1000 fellow Afghans who aided our military during the war in Afghanistan.
Trump is giving them a choice: Move to the DRC, or go back to Afghanistan and live under Taliban rule. (1/3)
MAHA advocates are fed up with this administration paying lip service to their movement while delivering win after win for the chemical industry.
Let’s just say EPA Admin. Zeldin did not respond well to being called out on his and his agency’s MAHA hypocrisy.
Now, Congress could hand Bayer legal immunity, preventing people like Terry from suing chemical companies like Bayer over the harm they’ve caused.
Teri's story broke my heart. She lost her husband to cancer after spraying RoundUp on their farm for 40+ years.
Bayer has paid ~$10 BILLION to settle RoundUp lawsuits—and just set aside another ~$7 billion for future cases.
You don't pay that kind of money because there's nothing to worry about.
A Farm Bill that protects chemical companies over American families is not pro-farmer.
It is not pro-health.
It is not pro-America.
It is a giveaway to Big Chemical.
Bayer may have millions of dollars. But we have the people.
I’ve been an organic farmer for decades. I can tell you this: We DON'T need toxic chemicals like glyphosate to grow food.
Rep. Massie and I have an amendment to strip the pesticide liability shield from the Farm Bill and allow states + communities to warn citizens about the dangers of glyphosate.
I’ll be speaking at the People vs. Poison rally outside SCOTUS
We are coming together across the political spectrum to make one thing clear:
If your product poisons people, you should be held accountable. Period.
Tune in live: ThePeopleVsPoison.org
So grateful to hear that everyone at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner tonight is safe, and thankful for the swift response by law enforcement.
Maine’s legal cannabis businesses should be treated like the legitimate small businesses they are, but it is still necessary to fully decriminalize marijuana and correct the historical injustices of failed drug policies.
Marijuana businesses in Maine have been forced to operate under unfair, outdated federal rules for far too long.
Reclassifying medical marijuana could finally open the door to basic tax fairness, safer banking options, and long-blocked research into cannabis’ medical uses.
The recent order from acting Attorney General Todd Blanche does not legalize or decriminalize the drug, but it would make it easier for the industry to operate.
www.mainepublic.org/business-and...
It’s cruel, it’s unconstitutional, and it’s dangerous abuse of power.
I will continue to stand against any policy that erodes the rights of American citizens, regardless of where they were born.
This isn't about public safety or protecting the integrity of the system.
It's about fear.
It is about sending millions of naturalized Americans a chilling message that their citizenship is somehow less secure, less permanent, and less American than anyone else’s.
Trump’s DOJ is dramatically ramping up efforts to strip naturalized Americans of their citizenship.
Just as it has with its heinous immigration policies, the Admin is claiming they’re only going after the “worst of the worst.”
But we've heard that lie before, and we all know it's total bullshit.
There are priceless, historic American works of art in the Cohen Building that could be destroyed and lost forever.
Republicans love to posture as defenders of American history and heritage. But when it comes time to actually protect it, they’re standing by and letting Trump bulldoze it.
The East Wing.
The Kennedy Center.
A massive gilded arch.
Over and over, Trump is reshaping our nation’s capital in his own, tacky image—with no transparency, no consultation, and no respect for Congress’s role.
I’m so saddened to hear about the passing of my friend and colleague, David Scott.
David’s vision and leadership, especially when it came to empowering the next generation of Black farmers, will be deeply missed.
My heartfelt condolences to David’s loved ones. May his memory forever be a blessing.
The U.S. Court of Appeals has blocked Olivia’s deportation, and a decision on her immigration case could take months or years.
This young woman should not be sitting in detention while the agency stalls, stonewalls, and spins.
She should be released and reunited with her family in Maine.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Con. Res. 38 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Res. 1099 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1100 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H.R. 6472 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | S. 723 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | S. 2503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 6329 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-12 | H.R. 2189 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.J. Res. 72 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-10 | H.R. 1531 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-09 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.J. Res. 142 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 3123 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-02 | H.R. 980 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Con. Res. 68 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.J. Res. 140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.