I commend the Council for taking this on and giving voice to the significant and growing concerns in Scarborough and across Maine about ICE’s presence in our communities.
I will continue working alongside our neighbors to get ICE OUT of Maine.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Maine District 1
Chellie Pingree
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 612
Yes42%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting5%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Chellie Pingree
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMaine District 1
SoupScore
Chellie's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 23 sponsored · 176 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Tonight, the Scarborough Town Council will hold a meeting to take up a proclamation calling for a federal review of town's ICE facility—which has become a symbol of fear and uncertainty.
I sent the Council a letter today, and completely agree: DHS must undertake a serious review of this facility.
Whether it’s his dumb ballroom or arch, the reflecting pool disaster, or covering the Oval Office in gold schlock, Trump is treating D.C. like a giant monument to himself.
I’ve been fighting these insane projects every step of the way, and I won’t stop until these absurd plans are scrapped.
When a judge ordered Trump to remove his name from the Kennedy Center, I hoped it might be the end of his ridiculous obsession.
Apparently, his cronies are working on a plan to "put his mark all over it.”
Valentino runway shows?
A marina for yachts?
Fancy restaurants?
Are you f-ing kidding me?
How many David Brouillettes has ICE hired? How many violent, racist, unstable people have they handed guns to?
Republicans gave ICE virtually unlimited money to hire en masse, overlook troubling backgrounds, and rush training so they can meet their absurd quotas.
Enough is enough. #AbolishICE.
Multiple reports of domestic violence.
Accusations of racism.
A failed attempt to bypass Maine's police training requirements.
A long history of combative behavior.
Local law enforcement looked at David Brouillette and saw "too many red flags" to hire him.
Not too many for ICE, apparently.
I'll never forget what I saw inside Dilley during my oversight visit this spring.
Children are being treated like criminals and subjected to needless trauma.
That's why I joined 110 House Democrats in demanding that the Trump Admin #ShutDownDilley, end family detention, and free the children.
As ICE prepares to ramp up its campaign of cruelty, it’s important that everyone know their rights. Feel free to share the link below.
Here in Maine, we look out for our friends and neighbors. That means standing with our immigrant communities and doing everything we can to help and protect them.
More than 300,000 Haitians lost their TPS today. ICE is preparing to deport as many of them as possible.
The Admin claims Haiti's conditions have improved enough for TPS holders to return safely. Yet the State Department maintains a "Do Not Travel" advisory for the country.
It's unconscionable.
Many paper mills rely on raw materials imported from Canada (like wood pulp). Paper manufacturers will be forced to pass those costs on to their customers.
Trump’s reckless and combative trade policies are undermining Maine businesses and hurting consumers, who are already feeling the squeeze.
Maine imports more than $5B in goods from Canada each year. They’re by far our biggest international trade partner.
If Trump’s reckless tariffs go into effect, it could make a whole lot of things more expensive, from wine to hockey gear.
The impacts on wood products could be especially disastrous.
The Administration isn't interested in respecting the full scope of America’s history. All they care about is fast-tracking the Trump's vanity projects.
I will fight every attempt to weaken these critical safeguards or silence the communities and experts who deserve to have a seat at the table.
Rewriting Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act—behind closed doors, on a rushed timeline, and without meaningful input from states, Tribes, preservation experts, or the public—is beyond reckless.
This will dramatically weaken one of our most important historic preservation laws.
The idea that any Administration, regardless of party, should be allowed to cancel or withhold funding based on purely political considerations, and in direct defiance of the Constitution, is deeply un-American.
I will be demanding answers from the DOE. (5/5)
To make matters worse, the Admin has proposed a sweeping regulation that would formalize this type of political influence over federal spending at the expense of critical services to millions of Americans—giving people like Russ Vought the authority to cancel grants on a whim. (4/5)
For the communities that were relying on this funding, this is a devastating blow.
These projects would’ve built significant clean-energy infrastructure, helped families lower their bills, and created thousands of good-paying jobs. Projects that Congress already authorized and funded. (3/5)
From Day 1, this Admin has weaponized federal funding to punish their political opponents and reward their allies, blatantly defying the Constitution.
These cuts are just one example of their arrogance and callousness—and their maniacal obsession with punishing their perceived enemies. (2/5)
🧵
It was bad enough that the Admin illegally cancelled $7.5 billion in DOE grants for clean-energy projects—including in Maine.
That they based their cuts purely on politics—targeting states with Democratic governors, or that voted for Kamala Harris—is outrageous.
This is an huge scandal. (1/5)
Reposted byCongresswoman Chellie Pingree
Please join me on MS NOW 10a-1p w/
@pingree.house.gov
@erikaandiola.bsky.social
@johnjharwood.bsky.social
@baylisswagner.bsky.social
@byemmadavis.bsky.social
@lawyeroyer.com
@jasonselvig.bsky.social
V Spehar
#Connect
1/2
He’s already sabotaging the agreement, of course, but if any deal deserves to fall apart, it’s this one.
We should be working to REDUCE the number of nuclear weapons, not giving one of the most oppressive countries on earth the tools to build their own.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History612 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
612 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-21 | H. Res. 1438 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-07-21 | H.R. 1118 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-07-20 | H.R. 8823 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-07-20 | H.R. 4541 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-07-16 | H.R. 9237 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-07-16 | H.R. 5362 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-07-15 | H.R. 8595 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-07-15 | H.R. 8595 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-07-15 | H.R. 8595 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-07-15 | H.R. 8595 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-07-15 | H.R. 8595 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-07-15 | H.R. 8595 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-07-15 | H.R. 8595 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-07-14 | H.R. 1181 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-07-14 | H.R. 1181 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-07-14 | H.R. 139 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-07-14 | H. Res. 1423 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-07-14 | H. Res. 1423 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-07-13 | H.R. 8897 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2026-07-13 | H.R. 3106 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2026-06-30 | H. Res. 1399 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-30 | H. Con. Res. 108 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-30 | H. Res. 1398 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-30 | H. Res. 1398 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-29 | H.R. 7128 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-29 | H.R. 7757 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-06-25 | H.R. 2478 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-24 | H.R. 915 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-24 | H.R. 7401 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-23 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-23 | S. 629 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-11 | H. Res. 1335 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-11 | H.R. 9238 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-10 | H.R. 8464 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-10 | H.R. 8464 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-10 | H.R. 8312 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-10 | H.R. 7892 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-09 | H.R. 5408 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-09 | H. Res. 1140 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-09 | S. 2 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-09 | S. 2 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-06-09 | H. Res. 1140 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-09 | H. Res. 1345 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-09 | H. Res. 1345 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-08 | H.R. 8428 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-08 | H.R. 8466 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-05 | H.R. 2913 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H. Res. 518 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H.R. 8646 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-06-04 | H.R. 8646 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 13Next →