Adrian Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Nebraska District 3
Born
December 19, 1970
Age 55
Phone
(202) 225-6435
Office
502 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Nebraska District 3

Adrian Smith

Adrian Michael Smith is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for Nebraska's 3rd congressional district since 2007. A member of the Republican Party, he represented the 48th district in the Nebraska Legislature from 1999 to 2007. Smith is the dean of Nebraska's congressional delegation since 2022 following Jeff Fortenberry's resignation.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 496
Yes76%
No22%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 3

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Adrian Smith headshot
Adrian Smith
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNebraska District 3
SoupScore
Adrian's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 82 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

The fight for the Boundary Waters isn’t over, it just looks a little different now. We will not give up. That would play right into their hands.
Losing hope is exactly what they want us to do. While the vote against the Boundary Waters is fresh on our minds, the work continues.    Headed to Greater Minnesota now to keep up the fight. We have so much to do to tackle corporate greed in areas like housing and health care.
Since they’re abusing the Congressional Review Act to get around the filibuster, I am reserving some of my time so I can make closing remarks in the morning before the final vote. Maybe they’ll listen to reason after a night’s sleep. Stay tuned. Save the Boundary Waters.
Photo of my desk with a boundary waters canoe area forest service sign next to the Minnesota state flag and a framed photo of my parents.
70% of Minnesotans do NOT want copper nickel mining near the Boundary Waters. The Senate has a chance to do right by them by leaving the mining moratorium in place.
Reposted byTina Smith
As soon as today, the US Senate will vote on a House resolution that allows copper mining by a Chilean company near Minnesota’s Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. The Boundary Waters is the most-visited wilderness area in the country, and it cannot be replaced.
The Boundary Waters don’t just belong to Minnesotans. They’re the birthright of every single American. Why would we let a foreign mining company ruin them just so they can mine OUR resources, ship them off to China and enrich their shareholders?
Map showing the pollution a proposed copper-nickel mine would have on the Boundary Waters, Voyageurs National Park and Quetico Provincial Park.
The threat to the Boundary Waters isn’t just about Minnesota — the legislative gymnastics being thrust upon us to allow copper-nickel mining in this watershed would mean no public lands are ever truly protected. We would be opening Pandora’s box… for what? The profits of a foreign mining company?
Photo of a canoe in the Boundary Waters. The waters are so still that the sky is reflected on the surface.
From the guy who promised to “bring back American manufacturing” …the irony would be comical if it weren’t so frustrating
Trump, who has promoted "Buy America" policies and vowed to protect American steel, has secured tens of millions of dollars worth of donated foreign steel for his $400 million ballroom project, report @anaswanson.bsky.social and @lukebroadwater.bsky.social. www.nytimes.com/2026/04/08/u...
Can’t trust a word they say. They’re lying about what they’re doing in Minnesota and across the country. This is exactly why I’m not voting for a single penny for ICE or CBP without massive, agency-wide changes.
Reposted byTina Smith
Today is day 127 of the ICE occupation of MN. ICE is still here. Neighbors are still being abducted. So we’re here too. Still carrying whistles. Still standing watch in our neighborhoods. Still doing mutual aid. Still fighting for ICE OUT EVERYWHERE.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
496 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-03-05H. Con. Res. 38 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-03-05H. Res. 1099 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1100 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H.R. 6472 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04S. 723 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-24S. 2503 (119th)Fast-track passageNONOFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 6329 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-12H.R. 2189 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Motion to CommitNONOFailed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-11H.J. Res. 72 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-10H.R. 1531 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-09H.R. 6644 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-04H.J. Res. 142 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-03H.R. 7148 (119th)Accept Senate changesYESYESPassed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-03H.R. 3123 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-02H.R. 980 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H. Con. Res. 68 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7147 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-01-21H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 2 / 10Next →