
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Washington District 7
Pramila Jayapal
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 535
Yes36%
No58%
Present0%
Not Voting6%
Party align97%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 7
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Pramila Jayapal
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWashington District 7
SoupScore
Pramila's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 36 sponsored · 189 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Mike Johnson is co-opting the pieces of our stock trading ban to push forward a bill that lets the wealthiest Members of Congress own, trade, and buy stock.
It’s time to pass the bipartisan Restore Trust in Congress Act now & ACTUALLY ban congressional stock trading.
www.nytimes.com/2026/01/14/u...
This Friday in Minneapolis-Saint Paul, I’ll be chairing a shadow hearing after ICE’s invasion of the city and the killing of Renee Good. We will not back down in this fight for justice and accountability.
Tune in at 10am ET on January 16 to watch live: www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfVj...
BREAKING: the Trump administration is suspending Immigrant Visas for 75 countries.
This racist, xenophobic, and cruel policy will keep families separated indefinitely and shows how anti-immigrant the entire Republican Party is. It must be reversed immediately.
My full statement:
Republicans’ so-called stock trading ban bill is not what it seems — it is designed to let the wealthiest Members of Congress keep owning, buying, and trading stock.
Our bipartisan consensus bill is a true ban that puts the interests of the American people first. Let’s pass it.
On Trump’s “Liberation Day,” he promised that his tariffs would bring manufacturing jobs back to America.
But the U.S. has LOST manufacturing jobs in every single month since that announcement.
Trump’s economy is bad for American workers. www.wsj.com/livecoverage...
There is no world in which we can trust the Trump administration to conduct a fair, transparent investigation into how Renee Good was killed by ICE.
Trump, Noem, and Vance have lied to our faces constantly. But we all know what we saw on video.
Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement is making Americans LESS safe.
He is taking resources away from projects focused on real national security and public safety threats, and instead diverting them to inflicting violence and pain on our communities.
I’m an immigrant. I went through the grueling, years-long process of becoming a citizen because I believed in this country.
The way Trump has destroyed our legal immigration system and punished those trying to become citizens the right way is deeply upsetting and un-American.
Career prosecutors are being forced to resign because the Trump administration is pressuring them to not investigate the ICE agent who killed Renee Good and instead go after Good’s widow.
This weaponization of our justice system is stunning.
www.nytimes.com/2026/01/13/u...
If the Trump administration is so confident in the propaganda they have spouted about ICE’s killing of Renee Good, they should welcome an independent investigation.
But they won’t, because they KNOW they are lying. And we know it too.
As Trump’s ICE agents tear gas peaceful protestors, ram down doors without warrants, and now kill an innocent U.S. citizen, we cannot continue with business as usual.
@usprogressives.bsky.social will not vote to fund DHS until serious reforms and guardrails are put in place
Proud to stand w/ @usprogressives.bsky.social leaders today to announce that we will oppose all funding for Trump’s DHS until there are significant reforms enacted to ensure what happened last week in Minneapolis never happens again.
We will keep fighting for truth, accountability, and justice.
Last week, the House passed a three-year extension of Affordable Care Act tax credits to help millions of Americans afford health insurance.
Now, Trump is saying he may veto the bill if it passes the Senate. He does not want you to have health care. www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
I introduced an amendment blocking GOP legislation from taking effect until ICE fully cooperates with the state and county-led investigations into Renee Good’s killing.
Rather than vote on it, House Republicans blocked our committee from even considering it. Cowards.
This morning, Republicans marked up legislation solely meant to demonize immigrants in Minnesota.
I introduced an amendment that says their bill can’t take effect until ICE fully cooperates with state and county-led investigations into Renee Good’s killing.
MYTH: “immigration crackdowns and mass deportations help American workers”
FACT: Trump’s disastrous immigration policies are bad for the labor market — U.S. workers included — as the data from last week’s jobs report clearly shows.
Trump’s EPA is now ONLY considering the costs to corporations when setting air pollution rules, not how many lives could be saved.
He does not care if you live or die — if it means his billionaire buddies can save a buck. www.nytimes.com/2026/01/12/c...
The violence that many ICE and Border Patrol agents are bringing to our cities is completely unacceptable and makes all of us less safe.
Democrats need to see serious guardrails before we vote to give another dollar to the Department of Homeland Security.
How can we trust a word Trump’s administration says when they are clearly lying to us about what happened in Minneapolis?
We saw an ICE agent shoot and kill an innocent woman on video. Yet, Trump, Vance, and Noem want us to believe their lies instead of our own eyes.
Until we get serious guardrails in place for ICE and Border Patrol, Democrats must block funding to Trump and Kristi Noem’s DHS.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History535 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
535 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | S. 2503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 6329 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-12 | H.R. 2189 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.J. Res. 72 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-10 | H.R. 1531 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-09 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.J. Res. 142 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 3123 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-02 | H.R. 980 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Con. Res. 68 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.J. Res. 140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 6945 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 6945 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-21 | H. Res. 1009 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H. Res. 1009 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 5764 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-20 | H.R. 5763 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.