Rosa L. DeLauro headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Connecticut District 3
Born
March 2, 1943
Age 83
Phone
(202) 225-3661
Office
2413 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Connecticut District 3

Rosa L. DeLauro

Rosa Luisa DeLauro is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for Connecticut's 3rd congressional district since 1991. She is a member of the Democratic Party. The district is based in New Haven and includes most of its suburbs. DeLauro is the dean of Connecticut's congressional delegation since 2013 upon the retirement of Senator Joe Lieberman.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 498
Yes41%
No57%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 3

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Rosa L. DeLauro headshot
Rosa L. DeLauro
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratConnecticut District 3
SoupScore
Rosa L.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 31 sponsored · 67 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Thank you Griffin Hospital, Yale New Haven Health, Middlesex Health, CT Community Health Center Assoc., CT Hospital Assoc., & Cornell Scott-Hill Health Center for joining me in calling out how Medicaid and Affordable Care Act cuts would harm our state. Gutting healthcare programs threatens lives.
President Trump and House Republicans are attacking programs and services that keep Americans safe in order to pay for tax breaks for billionaires. Tune in now as I fight against House Republicans' misguided Homeland Security funding bill: youtu.be/bbMbseaLMgw
Entire communities have been forever changed by gun violence. Every day, 125 people are shot and killed in America. Congress must pass commonsense gun legislation, like an assault weapons ban and Ethan’s Law, so Americans can live free from gun violence.
81 years ago, British, Canadian, and American soldiers valiantly stormed the beaches of Normandy, beginning the liberation of Europe. Today, we honor the courage of those who fought and gave their lives on D-Day. We must defend the freedoms they won.
First, Republicans wanted to gut Medicaid. Then they target the ACA, which led to 38 million more Americans covered. Now they're coming for Medicare – vital care for our seniors. Why? They're owned by billionaires – and they’ll sell out Americans to support their sugar babies.
We won’t balance the budget on the backs of those who feed America. Republicans’ latest Agriculture & FDA funding bill shows us they refuse to get their priorities in order, at the expense of both farmers and families. @democrats-appropriations.house.gov push back: youtu.be/C6V7JoY6wjE
The administration fired thousands of UDSA workers responsible for keeping our food safe. Now, ground beef prices are up, and oops – now there’s E. coli. Who could have seen this coming? They want people to pay more to get sick & then cut their healthcare.
The Constitution makes it clear: Congress, not the White House holds the power of the purse. Join me and @democrats-appropriations.house.gov in our hearing with OMB Director Russ Vought to discuss the Administration’s illegal stealing of American dollars: youtu.be/k1sZP7VW8is
Russ Vought is the architect of Project 2025 – President Trump’s illegal plan to steal money from our communities. He is leading the illegal assault on programs that support hardworking families. We must expose his reckless actions.
One third of Americans get their healthcare from Medicaid— 40% of children, people with disabilities, low wage workers, & seniors. Some on Medicaid do not have any other option. Just say you're doing it for your billionaire donors.
“People will not lose their Medicaid unless they choose to do so," House Speaker Mike Johnson said. Several experts and organizations expose this for the lie that it is.
Reposted byRosa DeLauro
Considering this morning’s news about a certain administration-themed coin (👀), it’s worth revisiting @warren.senate.gov ‬+ @delauro.house.gov's letter calling for transparency in trade talks—warning of corruption risks and backroom deals. We clearly need the reminder. 📌 t.co/gDf6lNkfPZ
Screenshot of a letter from the U.S. Congress, dated May 12, 2025, addressed to Secretary Howard Lutnick (Department of Commerce), Secretary Scott Bessent (Department of the Treasury), and Ambassador Jamieson Greer (U.S. Trade Representative). The letter, signed by an unspecified member of Congress, criticizes the Trump administration’s chaotic and opaque tariff policies, citing economic harm, layoffs, and market volatility. It raises concerns about reciprocal tariffs and secretive bilateral negotiations with over 75 countries. The letter references a bipartisan resolution to revoke the president’s emergency trade powers and includes footnotes linking to Senate and news articles on the issue.
Over 200,000 constituents in my district are covered by Medicaid. Republicans want to destroy Medicaid, and they hope the American people do not notice. We must push back.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
498 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-03-05H. Con. Res. 38 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-03-05H. Res. 1099 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1100 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H.R. 6472 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04S. 723 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-24S. 2503 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 6329 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-02-12H.R. 2189 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Motion to CommitYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H.J. Res. 72 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-10H.R. 1531 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-09H.R. 6644 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-04H.J. Res. 142 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-03H.R. 7148 (119th)Accept Senate changesYESNOPassed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-03H.R. 3123 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-02H.R. 980 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H. Con. Res. 68 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7147 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-21H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 2 / 10Next →