Eugene Simon Vindman headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Virginia District 7
Born
June 6, 1975
Age 50
Phone
(202) 225-2815
Office
1005 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Virginia District 7

Eugene Simon Vindman

Eugene Semyon Vindman is an American politician, lawyer, and retired U.S. Army officer serving as the U.S. representative for Virginia's 7th congressional district since 2025. A member of the Democratic Party, he was a deputy legal advisor for the United States National Security Council (NSC) until he was reassigned on February 7, 2020.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 534
Yes50%
No49%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align91%
Cross-party9%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 7

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Eugene Simon Vindman headshot
Eugene Simon Vindman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratVirginia District 7
SoupScore
Eugene Simon's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 56 sponsored · 365 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

I was deeply saddened to hear of President Biden's cancer diagnosis. Cancer is a horrible disease that has touched every life in one way or another. Cindy and I join the American people in wishing him strength during this difficult time.
Thank you to everyone who joined my Latino Community Listening Session in Woodbridge yesterday. I appreciate all who took the time to share their thoughts, concerns, and priorities directly with me. It is conversations like these that help inform my work in Washington on your behalf.
May is National Military Appreciation Month — a time to honor those who have served and sacrificed for our country. My brothers and I were proud to wear the uniform, and I carry that experience with me every day as I work to support our service members and veterans.
Trump says he supports the police, but he’s gutting the very programs that help them do their jobs.   His budget cuts over $1 billion from DOJ law enforcement efforts and slashes FBI funding by more than $500 million.
Shannon and Christopher should be focused on making memories with Luka, not worried about extreme lawmakers ripping away their son’s care. I brought Luka and his family to the Capitol to share their story. Because every Member of Congress needs to understand the real cost of these cuts.
If House Republicans succeed, Luka could lose access to his medications, his specialists, and the in-home care that keeps him alive. His parents could lose the only lifeline that lets them keep their son alive — all so Trump's billionaire buddies can pocket another tax cut.
Luka is a 2-year-old in my district living with Nonketotic Hyperglycinemia (NKH) — a rare, life-threatening genetic disorder. His parents, Shannon and Christopher, work and have private insurance but Medicaid helps cover Luka’s essential care.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
534 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-04-20H.R. 1681 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-04-16H. Res. 1156 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 1689 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-16H. Res. 965 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6398 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6398 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-04-16H.R. 6409 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6409 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-04-16H. Con. Res. 40 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-04-15H. Res. 965 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2026-04-15H. Res. 1174 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-04-15H. Res. 1174 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-04-14H.R. 7613 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-14H.R. 1011 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-28H. Res. 1142 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-28H. Res. 1142 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-03-28Motion to AdjournNONOPassed
2026-03-27H.R. 7084 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2026-03-26H.R. 8029 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-26H.R. 8029 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-03-26H. Res. 1128 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-25H.R. 5103 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-25H.R. 5103 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-03-25H. Res. 1131 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-25H. Res. 1131 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-03-24H.R. 6422 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-19H.R. 4638 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2026-03-18H.J. Res. 139 (119th)Fast-track passageNONOFailed
2026-03-18H.R. 1958 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2026-03-18H.R. 556 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-18H.R. 556 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-03-17H. Res. 1115 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-17H. Res. 1115 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-03-17S. 3971 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-17H.R. 4294 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-03-05H. Con. Res. 38 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-03-05H. Res. 1099 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1100 (119th)Motion to ReferNOYESPassed
2026-03-04H.R. 6472 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04S. 723 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 2 / 11Next →