“[The analysis] shows that the House-passed legislation would lead to nearly 11 million people going uninsured, with more than 7.8 million of those individuals getting kicked off of Medicaid and millions more losing coverage through the ACA marketplace."
www.politico.com/news/2025/06...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Texas District 16
Veronica Escobar
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 536
Yes40%
No58%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 16
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Veronica Escobar
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratTexas District 16
SoupScore
Veronica's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 13 sponsored · 60 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
This isn’t immigration enforcement. These are police-state tactics that target people who did it “the right way,” not “criminals” or “gang members.”
This is fascism and has nothing to do with law-and-order.
elpasomatters.org/2025/06/03/i...
Republicans were so eager to cut your healthcare and give billionaires the biggest tax cut in American history that they didn't even fully read the devastating budget bill they passed in the middle of the night.
America, these are the people in charge.
Russell Vought had no shame or second thoughts about lying to the American people about this bill.
It's because they know it's unpopular and they're hoping Americans are not informed.
Don't let them win.
The Center for American Progress identified nearly 200 rural hospitals that were kept open by Medicaid funding.
If the Republican budget bill is signed into law, they could all close down.
www.americanprogress.org/article/medi...
Don't just take my word for it.
Even Republicans like Senator Josh Hawley have acknowledged all of this already.
www.nytimes.com/2025/05/12/o...
It WILL hurt Americans who rely on Medicaid for healthcare.
It WILL hurt Americans who work at hospitals that shut down.
It WILL hurt Americans in rural communities that'll no longer have access to healthcare.
Which brings us to his final point: 5. "No one will lose coverage."
When your whole argument is that the cuts are only to prevent "fraud, waste, and abuse" and "kick undocumented migrants off Medicaid," but the data doesn't support it, who will it hurt?
4. "There's undocumented immigrants on Medicaid."
This could be its own thread, but for now, let's be clear: undocumented immigrants are already not allowed to be on Medicaid.
www.kff.org/racial-equit...
Take Arkansas. They implemented work requirements and 25% of people subject to them lost coverage because of the reporting and documentation requirements.
This created a bureaucracy (which Trump has attacked) that directly led to less coverage.
www.cbpp.org/research/hea...
3. "We need more work requirements because there's too many people on Medicaid and SNAP not working."
The only part that "works" about work requirements is that they kick more people off programs with new red tape. More red tape = people are less inclined to use the program.
CMS also recorded that the improper payment rate last year was just over 5%, nowhere near what Vought falsely cites to justify cutting hundreds of billions of dollars.
www.cms.gov/data-researc...
According to the agency that administers Medicaid, CMS, improper payments can be overpayments, underpayments, or payments where insufficient information was provided to determine whether a payment was proper.
www.cms.gov/newsroom/fac...
Classifying payments as "improper" is one of the ways the government measures administrative performance in Medicaid, Medicare, and other federal programs.
As the Georgetown McCourt School of Public Policy points out, improper payments are not fraud.
ccf.georgetown.edu/2025/03/13/m...
2. He says that "1 out of every $5 or $6 in Medicaid is improper." Clearly his implication is that because of this data, it's justified to cut ~20% of Medicaid.
What he chooses to leave out is that "improper" is a specific term used by the government.
1. The Republican budget bill "preserves and protects" social safety net programs.
A blatant lie as I'm unaware of how cutting over a trillion dollars and kicking millions of Americans off health care is "preserving and protecting" this program.
In case you're not familiar with Vought, he's a right-wing Trump loyalist who's worked for him for years.
He wrote a chapter for Project 2025 arguing for the "aggressive use of the vast powers of the executive branch."
So what were his lies?
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
Over the weekend, the White House Director of the Office of Management and Budget and Project 2025 author Russell Vought spent his morning on CNN lying about the Republican budget bill.
Let's break this down 🧵
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History536 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
536 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2312 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2270 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6504 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-12 | H.R. 2683 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-09 | H.R. 5184 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 1834 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 131 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 504 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Divisions B and C | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Division A | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.