Juan Vargas headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 52
Born
March 7, 1961
Age 65
Phone
(202) 225-8045
Office
2467 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 52

Juan Vargas

Juan Carlos Vargas is an American businessman and politician who has been a U.S. representative for California since 2013. His district includes the southernmost portions of San Diego County.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 496
Yes38%
No59%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 52

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Juan Vargas headshot
Juan Vargas
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 52
SoupScore
Juan's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 10 sponsored · 92 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Elon Musk wants the financial information of every taxpayer, business, and nonprofit in the country. The answer must be NO. An unelected billionaire should not be allowed to go through your IRS records – or those of his business competitors.
In his first days in office, Trump has tried to: ❌ Freeze Medicaid ❌ Raise drug prices ❌ Cut assistance programs He’s prioritizing the agendas of billionaires and big corporations. Full stop.
Here are the FACTS:  81% of voters, both Republicans and Democrats, support the CFPB and want the agency to continue its work. Even so, Trump has moved to freeze the CFPB to take money out of YOUR pocket to line those of his billionaire friends. @ushousefsc.bsky.social won’t stand for it.
The majority of Americans support fixing our broken immigration system, keeping families together, and creating a pathway to citizenship for the Dreamers, farmworkers, and families who contribute so much to our communities. I'm fighting for these reforms in Congress.
Sending migrants to Guantanamo Bay – a place notorious for human rights violations – is dehumanizing and cruel. This is a clear attempt by the Trump Administration to act in the shadows and avoid oversight. We need to shut down Guantanamo, not expand it.
I’m the proud son of Mexican immigrants. I know that immigrants are essential to this nation. They’re our nurses, construction workers, and small business owners. They work hard, pay taxes, and strengthen our economy. A Day Without Immigrants is a powerful reminder of these truths.
Let’s be clear: mass deportations, mass detention, and other extreme measures raise serious civil liberties concerns and do nothing but create terror in our communities.  These are NOT real fixes that address our broken immigration system.
BREAKING: Donald Trump says he's directing the opening of a detention center at Guantanamo Bay to hold up to 30,000 migrants in the U.S. illegally.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
496 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-01-21H.R. 6945 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-21H.R. 6945 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-21H. Res. 1009 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-21H. Res. 1009 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-21H.R. 5764 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-20H.R. 5763 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Approve amendmentNOYESAgreed to
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-14H. Res. 992 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-14H. Res. 992 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 4593 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 4593 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2312 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2270 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2262 (119th)Final passageNONOFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2262 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H. Res. 988 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-13H. Res. 988 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 6504 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 6500 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-12H.R. 2683 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-09H.R. 5184 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 1834 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H. Res. 780 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 131 (119th)Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary NotwithstandingYESYESFailed
2026-01-08H.R. 504 (119th)Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary NotwithstandingYESYESFailed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Final passageNOYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Retaining Divisions B and CNOYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Retaining Division ANOYESPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 780 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 977 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 977 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-06Call of the HousePRESENTPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 498 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 498 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 845 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 845 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 1366 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 1366 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3492 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 3492 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 3 / 10Next →