Public housing stands broken and underfunded, and when we fail tenants, we fuel homelessness. Many thanks to Milan Ozdinec–a witness handpicked by the Republican leadership–for his forthright, clear-eyed testimony. Congress must do better.
youtu.be/FY6_s2m0axk
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 16
Sam T. Liccardo
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 612
Yes44%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 16
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Sam T. Liccardo
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 16
SoupScore
Sam T.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 17 sponsored · 44 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Growing bipartisan support for tackling our housing affordability crisis offers hope, but Congress must do more. I have several bipartisan housing bills ready to deliver real relief. Let’s get it done. 3/3
No community feels this more acutely than ours. I’m proud to help push these bills across the finish line—and to put down a marker for the long-overdue federal housing reforms ahead. 2/3
Two of my bipartisan housing bills just passed the House floor. We can’t bring down housing prices unless we close the gap between supply and demand. 1/3
Going to the big game? Get real-time updates by signing up for Santa Clara County emergency alerts. Stay informed, stay safe — and enjoy the game.
They took on one of the toughest challenges in our society and turned it into an opportunity. That’s the innovation that gives me hope. 3/3
Their app, Relink, uses AI and location-based tools to connect formerly incarcerated individuals with second-chance employers, housing options, and critical support services. 2/3
Congratulations to Shreyas Chatterjee, Shrehan Chatterjee, and Saumit Korada—the winners of the 2025 Congressional App Challenge in our district. 1/3
I invite the Secretary to come to Silicon Valley and see firsthand how this Administration’s policies raise costs on working families.
youtu.be/yTwWyzbcnCA?...
I voted against the two-week extension in ICE funding.
We took our fight straight to ICE headquarters—raising our voices in unison: Kristi Noem must go!
For the sake of our country and our global economy, I sincerely hope that Warsh shows his spine, rather than a supine posture we see too often in this Administration. 4/4
While Warsh has long held strong views about the Fed’s critical role in battling inflation with tighter monetary supply, he seems to have abandoned those principles in recent months, as this opportunity emerged. 3/4
If confirmed, Kevin Warsh must answer to the Federal Reserve’s mandate, not the President’s. 2/4
Global financial stability depends on an independent Federal Reserve. Over the past year, President Trump has worked relentlessly to undermine that independence—drawing ire and concern from experts across the ideological spectrum. 1/4
www.wsj.com/economy/cent...
We won’t stand for ICE inflicting chaos and cruelty in our communities.
Semiconductors are sexy again – and drive our economic future. I’m proud to have secured more than $1 million for San José State University to train the next generation of electrical engineers who will help America win the 21st century.
blogs.sjsu.edu/newsroom/202...
In the bills that the House approved, our district received more than $14 million for local projects supporting housing affordability and public safety. 2/2
sanjosespotlight.com/congressman-...
The cracks in the armor are widening. For the first time in this 119th Congressional session, Republicans actually sat down with Democrats to craft appropriations bills–instead of bulldozing us to a shutdown. 1/2
We have to end this national nightmare. The first step is holding those in charge accountable.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History612 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
612 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-26 | H.R. 8029 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-26 | H. Res. 1128 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 5103 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 5103 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-25 | H. Res. 1131 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H. Res. 1131 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-24 | H.R. 6422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-19 | H.R. 4638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.J. Res. 139 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 1958 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 556 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 556 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-17 | H. Res. 1115 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | H. Res. 1115 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | S. 3971 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | H.R. 4294 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Con. Res. 38 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Res. 1099 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1100 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H.R. 6472 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | S. 723 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-04 | H. Res. 1095 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-25 | H.R. 4758 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 4626 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | H. Res. 1075 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-24 | S. 2503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-24 | H.R. 6329 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-12 | H.R. 2189 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | S. 1383 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 261 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.J. Res. 72 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H.R. 3617 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1057 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-11 | H. Res. 1042 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-10 | H.R. 1531 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-09 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.J. Res. 142 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.